PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHPX vs. BOTZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CHPX vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF (CHPX) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHPX achieves a 60.49% return, which is significantly higher than BOTZ's -2.74% return.


CHPX

1D
0.65%
1M
-8.69%
6M
45.81%
YTD
60.49%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

BOTZ

1D
0.92%
1M
-5.80%
6M
-5.58%
YTD
-2.74%
1Y
6.85%
3Y*
7.34%
5Y*
0.96%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$28.68M$29.79M$37.55M
$4.80M$5.31M$11.57M

CHPX vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CHPX and BOTZ is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025

0.75

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CHPX vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CHPX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


BOTZ
BOTZ Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
BOTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
BOTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CHPX vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF (CHPX) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CHPXBOTZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.76

CHPX vs. BOTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CHPX vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHPX drawdown since its inception was -27.10%, smaller than the maximum BOTZ drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPX and BOTZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CHPXBOTZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.10%

-55.54%

+28.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.92%

-15.36%

-5.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.30%

-18.22%

+12.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.59%

Volatility

CHPX vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CHPXBOTZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.96%

26.37%

+18.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.96%

27.27%

+17.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.96%

25.88%

+19.08%

CHPX vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHPX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than BOTZ's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

CHPX vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison

CHPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than BOTZ's 0.50% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
0.50%0.66%0.13%0.20%0.23%0.16%0.19%0.83%1.44%0.01%0.06%
CHPX
Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF
0.04%0.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CHPX and BOTZ have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CHPX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CHPX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for BOTZ.

BOTZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.50%, compared with 0.04% for CHPX.

CHPX tracks Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum Index, while BOTZ tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for CHPX and 0.68% for BOTZ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CHPX and BOTZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer