CHPS.TO vs. VRT
CHPS.TO (Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF) is Artificial Intelligence fund tracking the PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index, while VRT (Vertiv Holdings Co.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, CHPS.TO returned 25.57%/yr vs 60.67%/yr for VRT. Their 0.62 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
CHPS.TO vs. VRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CHPS.TO is traded in CAD, while VRT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VRT values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHPS.TO achieves a 44.43% return, which is significantly lower than VRT's 66.32% return.
CHPS.TO
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- -10.50%
- 6M
- 32.24%
- YTD
- 44.43%
- 1Y
- 75.11%
- 3Y*
- 40.71%
- 5Y*
- 25.57%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 26.08%
VRT
- 1D
- 8.97%
- 1M
- -13.68%
- 6M
- 42.42%
- YTD
- 66.32%
- 1Y
- 88.20%
- 3Y*
- 98.02%
- 5Y*
- 60.67%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 52.42%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$6.23M | CA$6.24M | CA$7.42M | |
| CA$2.91B | CA$2.41B | CA$2.77B |
CHPS.TO vs. VRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHPS.TO Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF | 44.43% | 45.93% | 20.38% | 68.20% | -37.86% | 23.13% |
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co. | 66.32% | 36.28% | 156.87% | 243.44% | -41.78% | -4.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHPS.TO and VRT is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2021 | 0.62 |
The correlation between CHPS.TO and VRT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHPS.TO vs. VRT — Risk / Return Rank
CHPS.TO
VRT
CHPS.TO vs. VRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS.TO) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CHPS.TO | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.26 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.20 | 2.28 | +0.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.18 | 7.66 | +4.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CHPS.TO vs. VRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHPS.TO drawdown since its inception was -48.16%, smaller than the maximum VRT drawdown of -70.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPS.TO and VRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHPS.TO | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.16% | -70.64% | +22.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.71% | -38.97% | +16.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.49% | -62.12% | +24.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.16% | -70.64% | +22.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.00% | -28.45% | +11.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.75% | -15.93% | +2.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.96% | 11.56% | -5.60% |
Volatility
CHPS.TO vs. VRT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS.TO) is 14.23%, while Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) has a volatility of 26.15%. This indicates that CHPS.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHPS.TO | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.23% | 26.15% | -11.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.34% | 53.41% | -20.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.46% | 65.19% | -25.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.50% | 63.85% | -28.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.33% | 55.84% | -20.51% |
Dividends
CHPS.TO vs. VRT - Dividend Comparison
CHPS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than VRT's 0.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHPS.TO Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.20% | 0.53% | 0.97% | 0.01% | 0.00% |
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co. | 0.09% | 0.11% | 0.10% | 0.05% | 0.07% | 0.04% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHPS.TO and VRT have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CHPS.TO and VRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer