CHPS.TO vs. CHPS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CHPS.TO (Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF) and CHPS (Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF) are both Semiconductors funds - CHPS.TO tracks the PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index while CHPS tracks the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CHPS.TO returned 134.35% vs 227.85% for CHPS. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CHPS.TO charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CHPS.

Performance

CHPS.TO vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS.TO) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

CHPS.TO is traded in CAD, while CHPS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CHPS values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHPS.TO achieves a 66.03% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS's 110.61% return.

CHPS.TO

• 1D: 0.93%
• 1M: 28.67%
• YTD: 66.03%
• 6M: 59.28%
• 1Y: 134.35%
• 3Y*: 51.56%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CHPS

• 1D: 2.28%
• 1M: 34.96%
• YTD: 110.61%
• 6M: 108.23%
• 1Y: 227.85%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHPS.TO vs. CHPS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CHPS.TO Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF	66.03%	45.93%	20.38%	10.65%
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	110.61%	51.20%	17.00%	12.01%

Correlation

The correlation between CHPS.TO and CHPS is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2023	0.89

The correlation between CHPS.TO and CHPS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

CHPS.TO vs. CHPS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CHPS.TO	CHPS
Technology	100.0%	98.8%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	0.5%
Financial Services	-	0.2%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	0.4%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

CHPS.TO vs. CHPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHPS.TO

CHPS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 94
CHPS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
CHPS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
CHPS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 92
CHPS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
CHPS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 95

CHPS

CHPS Risk / Return Rank: 97
CHPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
CHPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
CHPS Omega Ratio Rank: 96
CHPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
CHPS Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHPS.TO vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS.TO) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CHPS.TO	CHPS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	4.30	6.74	-2.44
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.53	6.21	-1.69
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.63	1.84	-0.21
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	10.12	14.35	-4.22
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	30.54	52.80	-22.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CHPS.TO vs. CHPS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHPS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 4.30, which is lower than the CHPS Sharpe Ratio of 6.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHPS.TO and CHPS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CHPS.TO	CHPS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.30	6.74	-2.44
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.91	1.95	-1.05

Drawdowns

CHPS.TO vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHPS.TO drawdown since its inception was -48.16%, which is greater than CHPS's maximum drawdown of -36.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPS.TO and CHPS.

Drawdown Indicators

	CHPS.TO	CHPS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.16%	-36.58%	-11.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.35%	-15.99%	+2.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-37.49%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.90%	-8.09%	-5.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.42%	4.34%	+0.08%

Volatility

CHPS.TO vs. CHPS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS.TO) is 11.35%, while Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) has a volatility of 14.23%. This indicates that CHPS.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CHPS.TO	CHPS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.35%	14.23%	-2.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.81%	27.85%	-3.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.48%	34.04%	-2.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.79%	32.93%	+0.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.79%	32.93%	+0.86%

CHPS.TO vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHPS.TO has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPS's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

CHPS.TO vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison

CHPS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than CHPS's 0.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	0.32%	0.68%	1.75%	0.36%	0.00%	0.00%
CHPS.TO Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF	0.01%	0.01%	0.20%	0.53%	0.97%	0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CHPS.TO and CHPS in my portfolio?

CHPS.TO and CHPS have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CHPS.TO or CHPS?

On fees, CHPS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CHPS.TO or CHPS?

CHPS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for CHPS.TO.

What is the main difference between CHPS.TO and CHPS?

CHPS.TO tracks PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index, while CHPS tracks Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for CHPS.TO and 0.15% for CHPS.