PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHPS.TO vs. XCHP.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CHPS.TO vs. XCHP.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS.TO) and iShares Semiconductor Index ETF (XCHP.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CHPS.TO vs. XCHP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CHPS.TO
Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF
6.25%45.93%20.38%18.30%
XCHP.TO
iShares Semiconductor Index ETF
10.64%33.58%21.73%15.27%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHPS.TO achieves a 6.25% return, which is significantly lower than XCHP.TO's 10.64% return.


CHPS.TO

1D
5.64%
1M
-2.54%
YTD
6.25%
6M
12.90%
1Y
74.89%
3Y*
34.79%
5Y*
10Y*

XCHP.TO

1D
5.96%
1M
-4.67%
YTD
10.64%
6M
21.29%
1Y
70.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CHPS.TO vs. XCHP.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHPS.TO has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than XCHP.TO's 0.39% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CHPS.TO vs. XCHP.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHPS.TO
CHPS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
CHPS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHPS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHPS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
CHPS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHPS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

XCHP.TO
XCHP.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
XCHP.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCHP.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCHP.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
XCHP.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCHP.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHPS.TO vs. XCHP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS.TO) and iShares Semiconductor Index ETF (XCHP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CHPS.TOXCHP.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.98

1.79

+0.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.58

2.41

+0.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.33

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.78

2.41

+2.36

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.10

8.88

+6.22

CHPS.TO vs. XCHP.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHPS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the XCHP.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHPS.TO and XCHP.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CHPS.TOXCHP.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98

1.79

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.98

-0.39

Correlation

The correlation between CHPS.TO and XCHP.TO is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

CHPS.TO vs. XCHP.TO - Dividend Comparison

CHPS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than XCHP.TO's 0.39% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
CHPS.TO
Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF
0.01%0.01%0.20%0.53%0.97%0.01%
XCHP.TO
iShares Semiconductor Index ETF
0.39%0.43%0.29%0.17%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CHPS.TO vs. XCHP.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHPS.TO drawdown since its inception was -48.16%, which is greater than XCHP.TO's maximum drawdown of -38.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPS.TO and XCHP.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CHPS.TOXCHP.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.16%

-38.95%

-9.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.68%

-17.39%

+1.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.93%

-9.11%

+1.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.36%

-9.24%

-5.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.96%

6.82%

-1.86%

Volatility

CHPS.TO vs. XCHP.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS.TO) is 12.07%, while iShares Semiconductor Index ETF (XCHP.TO) has a volatility of 13.40%. This indicates that CHPS.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XCHP.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CHPS.TOXCHP.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.07%

13.40%

-1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.85%

26.29%

-1.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.95%

40.94%

-2.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.66%

38.21%

-4.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.66%

38.21%

-4.55%