PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHLSY vs. TRTN-PA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CHLSY vs. TRTN-PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG (CHLSY) and Triton International Ltd (TRTN-PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHLSY achieves a -19.51% return, which is significantly lower than TRTN-PA's 3.86% return.


CHLSY

1D
-0.16%
1M
-4.35%
YTD
-19.51%
6M
-23.07%
1Y
-28.32%
3Y*
-0.77%
5Y*
10Y*

TRTN-PA

1D
0.00%
1M
0.04%
YTD
3.86%
6M
3.93%
1Y
10.11%
3Y*
8.88%
5Y*
6.30%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHLSY vs. TRTN-PA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CHLSY
Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG
-19.51%27.88%-7.36%-87.30%0.00%
TRTN-PA
Triton International Ltd
3.86%9.17%10.10%8.47%2.09%

Correlation

The correlation between CHLSY and TRTN-PA is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2022

-0.03

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CHLSY:

$26.20B

TRTN-PA:

$2.58B

EPS

CHLSY:

CHF 1.10

TRTN-PA:

$4.65

PE Ratio

CHLSY:

8.37

TRTN-PA:

5.49

PS Ratio

CHLSY:

1.03

TRTN-PA:

1.91

PB Ratio

CHLSY:

4.27

TRTN-PA:

1.62

Total Revenue (TTM)

CHLSY:

CHF 11.37B

TRTN-PA:

$1.35B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CHLSY:

CHF 6.54B

TRTN-PA:

$872.64M

EBITDA (TTM)

CHLSY:

CHF 2.46B

TRTN-PA:

$1.11B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CHLSY vs. TRTN-PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHLSY
CHLSY Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
CHLSY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHLSY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHLSY Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
CHLSY Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHLSY Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

TRTN-PA
TRTN-PA Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
TRTN-PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRTN-PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRTN-PA Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
TRTN-PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRTN-PA Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHLSY vs. TRTN-PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG (CHLSY) and Triton International Ltd (TRTN-PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CHLSYTRTN-PADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.26

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.84

3.46

-4.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.60

13.06

-14.67

CHLSY vs. TRTN-PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHLSY Sharpe Ratio is -0.68, which is lower than the TRTN-PA Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHLSY and TRTN-PA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CHLSY vs. TRTN-PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHLSY drawdown since its inception was -89.62%, which is greater than TRTN-PA's maximum drawdown of -57.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHLSY and TRTN-PA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CHLSYTRTN-PADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.62%

-57.11%

-32.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.74%

-2.93%

-30.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.74%

-2.94%

-30.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-87.89%

-0.44%

-87.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-77.92%

-2.31%

-75.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.71%

0.78%

+16.93%

Volatility

CHLSY vs. TRTN-PA - Volatility Comparison

Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG (CHLSY) has a higher volatility of 8.80% compared to Triton International Ltd (TRTN-PA) at 1.84%. This indicates that CHLSY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRTN-PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CHLSYTRTN-PADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.80%

1.84%

+6.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.82%

5.21%

+27.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.00%

7.42%

+34.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

62.75%

8.81%

+53.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.75%

21.29%

+41.46%

Dividends

CHLSY vs. TRTN-PA - Dividend Comparison

CHLSY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, less than TRTN-PA's 8.32% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
CHLSY
Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG
2.02%1.17%1.39%1.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TRTN-PA
Triton International Ltd
8.32%8.30%8.33%8.45%8.43%7.75%7.81%5.80%

Financials

CHLSY vs. TRTN-PA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG and Triton International Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B202120222023202420252026
3.53B
331.25M
(CHLSY) Total Revenue
(TRTN-PA) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. CHLSY values in CHF, TRTN-PA values in USD

CHLSY vs. TRTN-PA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG and Triton International Ltd over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%202120222023202420252026
39.4%
62.5%
Portfolio components
CHLSY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG reported a gross profit of 1.39B and revenue of 3.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.4%.

TRTN-PA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Triton International Ltd reported a gross profit of 206.99M and revenue of 331.25M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.5%.

CHLSY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG reported an operating income of 705.92M and revenue of 3.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.0%.

TRTN-PA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Triton International Ltd reported an operating income of 180.12M and revenue of 331.25M, resulting in an operating margin of 54.4%.

CHLSY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG reported a net income of 533.85M and revenue of 3.53B, resulting in a net margin of 15.1%.

TRTN-PA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Triton International Ltd reported a net income of 106.44M and revenue of 331.25M, resulting in a net margin of 32.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CHLSY and TRTN-PA have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CHLSY has higher volatility (8.80%) compared to TRTN-PA (1.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHLSY dropped -89.62% vs TRTN-PA's -57.11%.

TRTN-PA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CHLSY and TRTN-PA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer