CHLSY vs. FIP
CHLSY (Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG) and FIP (FTAI Infrastructure Inc.) are both stocks. CHLSY operates in Confectioners (Consumer Defensive), while FIP operates in Conglomerates (Industrials). Over the past 3 years, CHLSY returned -0.96%/yr vs 4.53%/yr for FIP. Their 0.05 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CHLSY vs. FIP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CHLSY having a -18.82% return and FIP slightly higher at -18.09%.
CHLSY
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- -4.33%
- 6M
- -17.85%
- YTD
- -18.82%
- 1Y
- -19.77%
- 3Y*
- -0.96%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -42.47%
FIP
- 1D
- -6.75%
- 1M
- -15.99%
- 6M
- -35.12%
- YTD
- -18.09%
- 1Y
- -39.59%
- 3Y*
- 4.53%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.49%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.04M | $1.06M | $1.20M | |
| $4.34M | $3.78M | $4.61M |
CHLSY vs. FIP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHLSY Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG | -18.82% | 27.88% | -7.36% | -87.30% | 0.00% |
FIP FTAI Infrastructure Inc. | -18.09% | -34.92% | 89.46% | 36.92% | 10.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHLSY and FIP is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2022 | 0.05 |
Fundamentals
CHLSY:
$26.51B
FIP:
$440.75M
CHLSY:
CHF 1.09
FIP:
-$3.38
CHLSY:
1.01
FIP:
0.73
CHLSY:
4.85
FIP:
0.65
CHLSY:
CHF 11.63B
FIP:
$594.72M
CHLSY:
CHF 5.21B
FIP:
$54.17M
CHLSY:
CHF 2.46B
FIP:
-$86.54M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHLSY vs. FIP — Risk / Return Rank
CHLSY
FIP
CHLSY vs. FIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG (CHLSY) and FTAI Infrastructure Inc. (FIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CHLSY | FIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 0.95 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.62 | -0.84 | +0.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.09 | -1.29 | +0.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CHLSY vs. FIP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHLSY drawdown since its inception was -89.62%, which is greater than FIP's maximum drawdown of -67.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHLSY and FIP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHLSY | FIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.62% | -67.98% | -21.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.93% | -46.74% | +12.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.51% | -67.98% | +33.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -87.79% | -62.22% | -25.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -78.21% | -25.89% | -52.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.18% | 30.22% | -11.04% |
Volatility
CHLSY vs. FIP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG (CHLSY) is 9.13%, while FTAI Infrastructure Inc. (FIP) has a volatility of 15.32%. This indicates that CHLSY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHLSY | FIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.13% | 15.32% | -6.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.45% | 49.08% | -18.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.61% | 72.30% | -30.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.02% | 60.91% | +1.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.02% | 60.91% | +1.11% |
Dividends
CHLSY vs. FIP - Dividend Comparison
CHLSY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, less than FIP's 3.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHLSY Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG | 2.00% | 1.17% | 1.39% | 1.11% | 0.00% |
FIP FTAI Infrastructure Inc. | 3.22% | 2.60% | 1.65% | 3.08% | 1.02% |
Financials
CHLSY vs. FIP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG and FTAI Infrastructure Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CHLSY vs. FIP - Profitability Comparison
CHLSY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG reported a gross profit of 842.03M and revenue of 2.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.4%.
FIP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, FTAI Infrastructure Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 188.36M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
CHLSY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG reported an operating income of 265.80M and revenue of 2.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.2%.
FIP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, FTAI Infrastructure Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 188.36M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
CHLSY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG reported a net income of 196.33M and revenue of 2.38B, resulting in a net margin of 8.2%.
FIP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, FTAI Infrastructure Inc. reported a net income of -154.53M and revenue of 188.36M, resulting in a net margin of -82.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CHLSY and FIP have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FIP has higher volatility (15.32%) compared to CHLSY (9.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHLSY dropped -89.62% vs FIP's -67.98%.
CHLSY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.50 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CHLSY and FIP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer