CHIQ vs. EWH
CHIQ (Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF) and EWH (iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CHIQ is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China Consumer Discretionary 10/50 Index, while EWH is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Hong Kong 25-50 Index (USD) (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CHIQ returned 6.32%/yr vs 4.38%/yr for EWH. Their 0.71 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CHIQ charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for EWH.
Performance
CHIQ vs. EWH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHIQ achieves a -12.61% return, which is significantly lower than EWH's 9.60% return. Over the past 10 years, CHIQ has outperformed EWH with an annualized return of 6.32%, while EWH has yielded a comparatively lower 4.38% annualized return.
CHIQ
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- 13.46%
- 6M
- -11.03%
- YTD
- -12.61%
- 1Y
- -11.86%
- 3Y*
- -1.64%
- 5Y*
- -8.27%
- 10Y*
- 6.32%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.17%
EWH
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 9.51%
- 6M
- -0.34%
- YTD
- 9.60%
- 1Y
- 16.36%
- 3Y*
- 11.17%
- 5Y*
- 1.35%
- 10Y*
- 4.38%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.93%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.03M | $735.04K | $809.72K | |
| $67.65M | $65.97M | $66.46M |
CHIQ vs. EWH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHIQ Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF | -12.61% | 13.69% | 10.74% | -10.70% | -22.01% | -27.07% | 92.61% | 44.19% | -28.65% | 67.74% |
EWH iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF | 9.60% | 34.50% | 0.00% | -13.87% | -6.81% | -3.49% | 4.17% | 10.74% | -8.76% | 36.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHIQ and EWH is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2009 | 0.71 |
The correlation between CHIQ and EWH shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CHIQ vs. EWH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CHIQ
EWH
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Technology
-
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
CHIQ
EWH
Consumer Defensive
CHIQ
EWH
Real Estate
CHIQ
EWH
Technology
CHIQ
EWH
-
Industrials
CHIQ
EWH
Basic Materials
CHIQ
-
EWH
-
Communication Services
CHIQ
-
EWH
Energy
CHIQ
-
EWH
-
Financial Services
CHIQ
-
EWH
Healthcare
CHIQ
-
EWH
-
Utilities
CHIQ
-
EWH
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHIQ vs. EWH — Risk / Return Rank
CHIQ
EWH
CHIQ vs. EWH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ) and iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF (EWH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CHIQ | EWH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.18 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.34 | 1.23 | -1.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.71 | 3.16 | -3.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CHIQ vs. EWH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHIQ drawdown since its inception was -67.04%, roughly equal to the maximum EWH drawdown of -66.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHIQ and EWH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHIQ | EWH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.04% | -66.44% | -0.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.53% | -13.41% | -22.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.53% | -23.77% | -11.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.89% | -39.32% | -15.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.04% | -42.71% | -24.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.15% | -5.13% | -49.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.87% | -19.43% | -11.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.85% | 5.19% | +11.66% |
Volatility
CHIQ vs. EWH - Volatility Comparison
Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ) has a higher volatility of 6.69% compared to iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF (EWH) at 4.04%. This indicates that CHIQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHIQ | EWH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.69% | 4.04% | +2.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.64% | 11.93% | +4.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.16% | 16.57% | +6.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.29% | 20.09% | +17.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.47% | 19.52% | +12.95% |
CHIQ vs. EWH - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHIQ has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than EWH's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
CHIQ vs. EWH - Dividend Comparison
CHIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, less than EWH's 4.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHIQ Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF | 1.54% | 1.48% | 2.65% | 2.26% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.11% | 1.05% | 2.71% | 0.62% | 1.51% | 4.86% |
EWH iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF | 4.52% | 5.20% | 4.17% | 4.28% | 2.91% | 2.78% | 2.56% | 2.71% | 2.93% | 4.35% | 3.08% | 2.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHIQ and EWH have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHIQ has higher volatility (6.69%) compared to EWH (4.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHIQ dropped -67.04% vs EWH's -66.44%.
On 10-year performance, CHIQ leads with 6.32% vs 4.38% for EWH. On fees, EWH is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, EWH has been the lower-risk option at 4.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, CHIQ has performed better with a 6.32% return vs 4.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EWH is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CHIQ.
EWH has the higher dividend yield at 4.52%, compared with 1.54% for CHIQ.
CHIQ is categorized as China Equities, while EWH is Asia Pacific Equities. CHIQ tracks MSCI China Consumer Discretionary 10/50 Index, while EWH tracks MSCI Hong Kong 25-50 Index (USD) (Net). They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CHIQ and 0.50% for EWH.
EWH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.00 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CHIQ and EWH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer