PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHIQ vs. DBE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CHIQ vs. DBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHIQ achieves a -12.61% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 63.93% return. Over the past 10 years, CHIQ has underperformed DBE with an annualized return of 6.32%, while DBE has yielded a comparatively higher 11.75% annualized return.


CHIQ

1D
-0.78%
1M
13.46%
6M
-11.03%
YTD
-12.61%
1Y
-11.86%
3Y*
-1.64%
5Y*
-8.27%
10Y*
6.32%
ALL TIME*
2.17%

DBE

1D
-4.28%
1M
11.01%
6M
47.49%
YTD
63.93%
1Y
55.67%
3Y*
13.55%
5Y*
16.46%
10Y*
11.75%
ALL TIME*
2.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.03M$735.04K$809.72K
$1.35M$1.09M$1.64M

CHIQ vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CHIQ
Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF
-12.61%13.69%10.74%-10.70%-22.01%-27.07%92.61%44.19%-28.65%67.74%
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
63.93%-2.17%2.96%-12.14%33.77%57.56%-25.91%19.72%-12.95%5.21%

Correlation

The correlation between CHIQ and DBE is -0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2009

0.23

The correlation between CHIQ and DBE shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CHIQ vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CHIQ
CHIQ Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
CHIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
CHIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

DBE
DBE Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
DBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBE Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
DBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBE Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CHIQ vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CHIQDBEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.26

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.34

2.26

-2.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.71

7.03

-7.74

CHIQ vs. DBE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHIQ Sharpe Ratio is -0.52, which is lower than the DBE Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHIQ and DBE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CHIQ vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHIQ drawdown since its inception was -67.04%, smaller than the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHIQ and DBE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CHIQDBEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.04%

-86.69%

+19.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.53%

-24.72%

-10.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.53%

-24.72%

-10.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.89%

-38.74%

-16.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.04%

-60.84%

-6.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-54.15%

-37.77%

-16.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.87%

-57.12%

+26.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.85%

7.95%

+8.90%

Volatility

CHIQ vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ) is 6.69%, while Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) has a volatility of 15.88%. This indicates that CHIQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CHIQDBEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.69%

15.88%

-9.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.64%

33.82%

-17.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.16%

37.86%

-14.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.29%

30.19%

+7.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.47%

28.64%

+3.83%

CHIQ vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHIQ has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

CHIQ vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison

CHIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, less than DBE's 2.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CHIQ
Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF
1.54%1.48%2.65%2.26%0.38%0.00%0.11%1.05%2.71%0.62%1.51%4.86%
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
2.36%3.86%6.32%3.87%0.75%0.00%0.00%1.79%1.67%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CHIQ and DBE have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBE has higher volatility (15.88%) compared to CHIQ (6.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHIQ dropped -67.04% vs DBE's -86.69%.

On 10-year performance, DBE leads with 11.75% vs 6.32% for CHIQ. On fees, CHIQ is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, CHIQ has been the lower-risk option at 6.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DBE has performed better with a 11.75% return vs 6.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CHIQ is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBE.

DBE has the higher dividend yield at 2.36%, compared with 1.54% for CHIQ.

CHIQ is categorized as China Equities, while DBE is Oil & Gas. CHIQ tracks MSCI China Consumer Discretionary 10/50 Index, while DBE tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CHIQ and 0.78% for DBE.

DBE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CHIQ and DBE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer