CHIQ vs. DAX
CHIQ (Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF) and DAX (Global X DAX Germany ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CHIQ is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China Consumer Discretionary 10/50 Index, while DAX is a Europe Equities fund tracking the DAX Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CHIQ returned 5.83%/yr vs 9.55%/yr for DAX. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CHIQ charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for DAX.
Performance
CHIQ vs. DAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHIQ achieves a -24.52% return, which is significantly lower than DAX's -2.96% return. Over the past 10 years, CHIQ has underperformed DAX with an annualized return of 5.83%, while DAX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.55% annualized return.
CHIQ
- 1D
- -1.95%
- 1M
- -13.48%
- YTD
- -24.52%
- 6M
- -25.41%
- 1Y
- -24.60%
- 3Y*
- -1.32%
- 5Y*
- -13.15%
- 10Y*
- 5.83%
DAX
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- -2.41%
- YTD
- -2.96%
- 6M
- -2.90%
- 1Y
- 1.08%
- 3Y*
- 16.70%
- 5Y*
- 7.75%
- 10Y*
- 9.55%
CHIQ vs. DAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHIQ Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF | -24.52% | 13.69% | 10.74% | -10.70% | -22.01% | -27.07% | 92.61% | 44.19% | -28.65% | 67.74% |
DAX Global X DAX Germany ETF | -2.96% | 39.00% | 10.55% | 23.62% | -18.47% | 7.73% | 12.27% | 22.11% | -22.92% | 28.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHIQ and DAX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2014 | 0.46 |
CHIQ vs. DAX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CHIQ
DAX
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
CHIQ
DAX
Consumer Defensive
CHIQ
DAX
Real Estate
CHIQ
DAX
Technology
CHIQ
DAX
Industrials
CHIQ
DAX
Basic Materials
CHIQ
-
DAX
Communication Services
CHIQ
-
DAX
Energy
CHIQ
-
DAX
-
Financial Services
CHIQ
-
DAX
Healthcare
CHIQ
-
DAX
Utilities
CHIQ
-
DAX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHIQ vs. DAX — Risk / Return Rank
CHIQ
DAX
CHIQ vs. DAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ) and Global X DAX Germany ETF (DAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CHIQ | DAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.02 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.72 | 0.07 | -0.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.78 | 0.22 | -2.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CHIQ vs. DAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHIQ drawdown since its inception was -67.04%, which is greater than DAX's maximum drawdown of -45.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHIQ and DAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHIQ | DAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.04% | -45.58% | -21.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.18% | -14.82% | -19.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.18% | -16.03% | -18.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.95% | -38.92% | -21.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.04% | -45.58% | -21.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -60.40% | -6.84% | -53.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.69% | -10.48% | -20.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.85% | 4.84% | +9.01% |
Volatility
CHIQ vs. DAX - Volatility Comparison
Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ) has a higher volatility of 6.65% compared to Global X DAX Germany ETF (DAX) at 5.36%. This indicates that CHIQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHIQ | DAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.65% | 5.36% | +1.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.23% | 14.90% | +1.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.45% | 17.98% | +4.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.75% | 20.43% | +17.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.43% | 20.98% | +11.45% |
CHIQ vs. DAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHIQ has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than DAX's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
CHIQ vs. DAX - Dividend Comparison
CHIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, more than DAX's 1.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHIQ Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF | 1.96% | 1.48% | 2.65% | 2.26% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.11% | 1.05% | 2.71% | 0.62% | 1.51% | 4.86% |
DAX Global X DAX Germany ETF | 1.52% | 1.47% | 2.24% | 2.48% | 2.80% | 2.65% | 2.25% | 2.47% | 3.33% | 1.73% | 1.78% | 1.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHIQ and DAX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHIQ has higher volatility (6.65%) compared to DAX (5.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHIQ dropped -67.04% vs DAX's -45.58%.
On 10-year performance, DAX leads with 9.55% vs 5.83% for CHIQ. On fees, DAX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, DAX has been the lower-risk option at 5.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DAX has performed better with a 9.55% return vs 5.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DAX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CHIQ.
CHIQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 1.52% for DAX.
CHIQ is categorized as China Equities, while DAX is Europe Equities. CHIQ tracks MSCI China Consumer Discretionary 10/50 Index, while DAX tracks DAX Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CHIQ and 0.20% for DAX.
DAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.06 vs -1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CHIQ and DAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer