CHIQ vs. COPX
CHIQ (Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF) and COPX (Global X Copper Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CHIQ is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China Consumer Discretionary 10/50 Index, while COPX is a Copper fund tracking the Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CHIQ returned 5.83%/yr vs 20.22%/yr for COPX. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.65% expense ratio.
Performance
CHIQ vs. COPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHIQ achieves a -24.52% return, which is significantly lower than COPX's 5.45% return. Over the past 10 years, CHIQ has underperformed COPX with an annualized return of 5.83%, while COPX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.22% annualized return.
CHIQ
- 1D
- -1.95%
- 1M
- -13.48%
- YTD
- -24.52%
- 6M
- -25.41%
- 1Y
- -24.60%
- 3Y*
- -1.32%
- 5Y*
- -13.15%
- 10Y*
- 5.83%
COPX
- 1D
- -4.76%
- 1M
- -9.18%
- YTD
- 5.45%
- 6M
- 5.05%
- 1Y
- 80.71%
- 3Y*
- 29.47%
- 5Y*
- 17.67%
- 10Y*
- 20.22%
CHIQ vs. COPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHIQ Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF | -24.52% | 13.69% | 10.74% | -10.70% | -22.01% | -27.07% | 92.61% | 44.19% | -28.65% | 67.74% |
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | 5.45% | 93.50% | 3.57% | 8.38% | -0.76% | 23.39% | 51.66% | 12.48% | -31.31% | 38.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHIQ and COPX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2010 | 0.56 |
The correlation between CHIQ and COPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
CHIQ vs. COPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CHIQ
COPX
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
CHIQ
COPX
-
Consumer Defensive
CHIQ
COPX
-
Real Estate
CHIQ
COPX
-
Technology
CHIQ
COPX
-
Industrials
CHIQ
COPX
Basic Materials
CHIQ
-
COPX
Communication Services
CHIQ
-
COPX
-
Energy
CHIQ
-
COPX
-
Financial Services
CHIQ
-
COPX
-
Healthcare
CHIQ
-
COPX
-
Utilities
CHIQ
-
COPX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHIQ vs. COPX — Risk / Return Rank
CHIQ
COPX
CHIQ vs. COPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ) and Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CHIQ | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.29 | -0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.72 | 2.92 | -3.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.78 | 8.78 | -10.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CHIQ vs. COPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHIQ drawdown since its inception was -67.04%, smaller than the maximum COPX drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHIQ and COPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHIQ | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.04% | -83.16% | +16.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.18% | -27.82% | -6.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.18% | -39.72% | +5.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.95% | -42.12% | -17.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.04% | -65.41% | -1.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -60.40% | -20.90% | -39.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.69% | -39.23% | +8.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.85% | 9.22% | +4.63% |
Volatility
CHIQ vs. COPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ) is 6.65%, while Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) has a volatility of 19.60%. This indicates that CHIQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHIQ | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.65% | 19.60% | -12.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.23% | 39.41% | -23.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.45% | 44.70% | -22.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.75% | 37.09% | +0.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.43% | 35.77% | -3.34% |
CHIQ vs. COPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both CHIQ and COPX have an expense ratio of 0.65%.
Dividends
CHIQ vs. COPX - Dividend Comparison
CHIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, less than COPX's 2.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHIQ Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF | 1.96% | 1.48% | 2.65% | 2.26% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.11% | 1.05% | 2.71% | 0.62% | 1.51% | 4.86% |
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | 2.54% | 2.68% | 1.80% | 2.39% | 3.14% | 1.48% | 1.30% | 1.37% | 2.59% | 1.57% | 0.60% | 1.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHIQ and COPX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COPX has higher volatility (19.60%) compared to CHIQ (6.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHIQ dropped -67.04% vs COPX's -83.16%.
On 10-year performance, COPX leads with 20.22% vs 5.83% for CHIQ. Both ETFs have the same 0.65% expense ratio. On volatility, CHIQ has been the lower-risk option at 6.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, COPX has performed better with a 20.22% return vs 5.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CHIQ and COPX have the same expense ratio: 0.65% per year.
COPX has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 1.96% for CHIQ.
CHIQ is categorized as China Equities, while COPX is Copper. CHIQ tracks MSCI China Consumer Discretionary 10/50 Index, while COPX tracks Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index.
COPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs -1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CHIQ and COPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer