CHIN.L vs. CEBG.L
CHIN.L (ICBC Credit Suisse UCITS ETF SICAV - ICBCCS WisdomTree S&P China 500 UCITS ETF) and CEBG.L (VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A) are both China Equities funds tracking the MSCI China NR USD, from ICBC Credit Suisse Asset Management and VanEck respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CHIN.L returned 13.83%/yr vs 1.87%/yr for CEBG.L. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CHIN.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for CEBG.L.
Performance
CHIN.L vs. CEBG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CHIN.L is traded in USD, while CEBG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the CEBG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHIN.L achieves a 4.43% return, which is significantly higher than CEBG.L's -7.80% return.
CHIN.L
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- -1.39%
- YTD
- 4.43%
- 6M
- 4.29%
- 1Y
- 24.67%
- 3Y*
- 13.83%
- 5Y*
- -1.86%
- 10Y*
- —
CEBG.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -5.55%
- YTD
- -7.80%
- 6M
- -8.61%
- 1Y
- 2.33%
- 3Y*
- 1.87%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CHIN.L vs. CEBG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHIN.L ICBC Credit Suisse UCITS ETF SICAV - ICBCCS WisdomTree S&P China 500 UCITS ETF | 4.43% | 32.60% | 14.52% | -13.55% | -25.21% | -0.37% |
CEBG.L VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A | -7.80% | 24.16% | -0.43% | -9.73% | -28.08% | -21.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHIN.L and CEBG.L is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2021 | 0.82 |
The correlation between CHIN.L and CEBG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHIN.L vs. CEBG.L — Risk / Return Rank
CHIN.L
CEBG.L
CHIN.L vs. CEBG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ICBC Credit Suisse UCITS ETF SICAV - ICBCCS WisdomTree S&P China 500 UCITS ETF (CHIN.L) and VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A (CEBG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CHIN.L | CEBG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.04 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.73 | 0.16 | +2.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.78 | 0.34 | +6.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CHIN.L vs. CEBG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHIN.L drawdown since its inception was -55.88%, roughly equal to the maximum CEBG.L drawdown of -58.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHIN.L and CEBG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHIN.L | CEBG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.88% | -58.82% | +2.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.01% | -14.88% | +5.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.03% | -28.11% | +4.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.37% | -42.83% | +21.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.38% | -43.37% | +18.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.63% | 6.86% | -3.23% |
Volatility
CHIN.L vs. CEBG.L - Volatility Comparison
ICBC Credit Suisse UCITS ETF SICAV - ICBCCS WisdomTree S&P China 500 UCITS ETF (CHIN.L) has a higher volatility of 6.37% compared to VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A (CEBG.L) at 4.04%. This indicates that CHIN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEBG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHIN.L | CEBG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.37% | 4.04% | +2.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.72% | 11.77% | +1.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.85% | 16.83% | +2.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.50% | 28.61% | -4.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.02% | 28.61% | -5.59% |
CHIN.L vs. CEBG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHIN.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than CEBG.L's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
CHIN.L vs. CEBG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CHIN.L nor CEBG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEBG.L VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CHIN.L ICBC Credit Suisse UCITS ETF SICAV - ICBCCS WisdomTree S&P China 500 UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.33% | 1.01% | 1.19% | 2.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHIN.L and CEBG.L have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CHIN.L is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CHIN.L is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CEBG.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI China NR USD. They also come from different issuers: ICBC Credit Suisse Asset Management and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for CHIN.L and 0.60% for CEBG.L.
Find the right allocation for CHIN.L and CEBG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer