CHIN.L vs. XCNA.L
Compare and contrast key facts about ICBC Credit Suisse UCITS ETF SICAV - ICBCCS WisdomTree S&P China 500 UCITS ETF (CHIN.L) and Xtrackers MSCI China A ESG Screened Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCNA.L).
CHIN.L and XCNA.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CHIN.L is a passively managed fund by ICBC Credit Suisse Asset Management that tracks the performance of the MSCI China NR USD. It was launched on Jul 26, 2016. XCNA.L is a passively managed fund by DWS that tracks the performance of the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. It was launched on Jun 15, 2022. Both CHIN.L and XCNA.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CHIN.L vs. XCNA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CHIN.L vs. XCNA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHIN.L ICBC Credit Suisse UCITS ETF SICAV - ICBCCS WisdomTree S&P China 500 UCITS ETF | -1.68% | 32.57% | 14.56% | -13.55% | -11.09% |
XCNA.L Xtrackers MSCI China A ESG Screened Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 0.60% | 32.54% | 14.47% | -12.47% | 11.73% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHIN.L achieves a -1.68% return, which is significantly lower than XCNA.L's 0.60% return.
CHIN.L
- 1D
- 1.71%
- 1M
- -3.37%
- YTD
- -1.68%
- 6M
- -3.39%
- 1Y
- 21.14%
- 3Y*
- 7.22%
- 5Y*
- -2.84%
- 10Y*
- —
XCNA.L
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- -2.76%
- YTD
- 0.60%
- 6M
- 3.59%
- 1Y
- 31.90%
- 3Y*
- 8.15%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CHIN.L vs. XCNA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHIN.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than XCNA.L's 0.29% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CHIN.L vs. XCNA.L — Risk / Return Rank
CHIN.L
XCNA.L
CHIN.L vs. XCNA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ICBC Credit Suisse UCITS ETF SICAV - ICBCCS WisdomTree S&P China 500 UCITS ETF (CHIN.L) and Xtrackers MSCI China A ESG Screened Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCNA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CHIN.L | XCNA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.05 | 1.82 | -0.77 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.45 | 2.33 | -0.88 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.34 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | 3.25 | -1.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.22 | 14.40 | -8.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CHIN.L | XCNA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.05 | 1.82 | -0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.12 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.45 | -0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between CHIN.L and XCNA.L is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CHIN.L vs. XCNA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CHIN.L nor XCNA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHIN.L ICBC Credit Suisse UCITS ETF SICAV - ICBCCS WisdomTree S&P China 500 UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.33% | 1.01% | 1.19% | 2.38% |
XCNA.L Xtrackers MSCI China A ESG Screened Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CHIN.L vs. XCNA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHIN.L drawdown since its inception was -55.89%, which is greater than XCNA.L's maximum drawdown of -32.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHIN.L and XCNA.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHIN.L | XCNA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.89% | -32.05% | -23.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.18% | -11.13% | -2.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.96% | -3.79% | -22.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.76% | -14.83% | -9.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.46% | 2.22% | +1.24% |
Volatility
CHIN.L vs. XCNA.L - Volatility Comparison
ICBC Credit Suisse UCITS ETF SICAV - ICBCCS WisdomTree S&P China 500 UCITS ETF (CHIN.L) has a higher volatility of 5.71% compared to Xtrackers MSCI China A ESG Screened Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCNA.L) at 4.73%. This indicates that CHIN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XCNA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CHIN.L | XCNA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.71% | 4.73% | +0.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.96% | 11.15% | +1.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.01% | 17.47% | +2.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.31% | 24.61% | -0.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.85% | 24.61% | -1.76% |