CEBG.L vs. HMCD.L
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A (CEBG.L) and HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF (HMCD.L).
CEBG.L and HMCD.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CEBG.L is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MSCI China NR USD. It was launched on Sep 24, 2021. HMCD.L is a passively managed fund by HSBC that tracks the performance of the MSCI China NR USD. It was launched on Jan 26, 2011. Both CEBG.L and HMCD.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CEBG.L vs. HMCD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CEBG.L vs. HMCD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEBG.L VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A | -2.72% | 15.45% | 1.26% | -14.25% | -19.48% | 6.97% |
HMCD.L HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF | -5.18% | 22.20% | 20.76% | -15.94% | -13.31% | -5.77% |
Different Trading Currencies
CEBG.L is traded in GBP, while HMCD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HMCD.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEBG.L achieves a -2.72% return, which is significantly higher than HMCD.L's -5.18% return.
CEBG.L
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- -3.60%
- YTD
- -2.72%
- 6M
- -9.29%
- 1Y
- 7.90%
- 3Y*
- -2.89%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HMCD.L
- 1D
- 1.36%
- 1M
- -2.38%
- YTD
- -5.18%
- 6M
- -12.45%
- 1Y
- 2.58%
- 3Y*
- 4.47%
- 5Y*
- -4.38%
- 10Y*
- 5.76%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CEBG.L vs. HMCD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEBG.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than HMCD.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CEBG.L vs. HMCD.L — Risk / Return Rank
CEBG.L
HMCD.L
CEBG.L vs. HMCD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A (CEBG.L) and HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF (HMCD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEBG.L | HMCD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.43 | 0.12 | +0.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.67 | 0.31 | +0.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.04 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.61 | 0.24 | +0.37 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.71 | 0.62 | +1.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEBG.L | HMCD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 | 0.12 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.22 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.15 | 0.17 | -0.32 |
Correlation
The correlation between CEBG.L and HMCD.L is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CEBG.L vs. HMCD.L - Dividend Comparison
CEBG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HMCD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEBG.L VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HMCD.L HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF | 2.14% | 2.25% | 2.20% | 2.08% | 1.95% | 1.31% | 0.86% | 1.59% | 1.46% | 0.75% | 2.07% | 2.95% |
Drawdowns
CEBG.L vs. HMCD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEBG.L drawdown since its inception was -46.41%, smaller than the maximum HMCD.L drawdown of -56.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEBG.L and HMCD.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEBG.L | HMCD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.41% | -62.46% | +16.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.28% | -16.95% | +3.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -56.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -62.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.36% | -34.66% | +11.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.50% | -24.20% | -0.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.76% | 6.52% | -1.76% |
Volatility
CEBG.L vs. HMCD.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A (CEBG.L) is 5.64%, while HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF (HMCD.L) has a volatility of 6.91%. This indicates that CEBG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HMCD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CEBG.L | HMCD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.64% | 6.91% | -1.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.62% | 14.12% | -2.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.33% | 21.32% | -2.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.60% | 27.83% | -3.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.60% | 25.61% | -1.01% |