CHIN.L vs. CNYA
Compare and contrast key facts about ICBC Credit Suisse UCITS ETF SICAV - ICBCCS WisdomTree S&P China 500 UCITS ETF (CHIN.L) and iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA).
CHIN.L and CNYA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CHIN.L is a passively managed fund by ICBC Credit Suisse Asset Management that tracks the performance of the MSCI China NR USD. It was launched on Jul 26, 2016. CNYA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI China A Inclusion Index. It was launched on Jun 13, 2016. Both CHIN.L and CNYA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CHIN.L or CNYA.
Key characteristics
| CHIN.L | CNYA | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 10.97% | 6.35% |
| 1Y Return | -1.70% | -7.36% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -13.84% | -11.82% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -1.52% | 2.53% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.09 | -0.46 |
| Daily Std Dev | 21.01% | 17.91% |
| Max Drawdown | -56.80% | -49.49% |
| Current Drawdown | -46.11% | -39.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHIN.L and CNYA is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
CHIN.L vs. CNYA - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CHIN.L achieves a 10.97% return, which is significantly higher than CNYA's 6.35% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CHIN.L vs. CNYA - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHIN.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than CNYA's 0.60% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CHIN.L vs. CNYA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ICBC Credit Suisse UCITS ETF SICAV - ICBCCS WisdomTree S&P China 500 UCITS ETF (CHIN.L) and iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CHIN.L vs. CNYA - Dividend Comparison
CHIN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CNYA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.98%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHIN.L ICBC Credit Suisse UCITS ETF SICAV - ICBCCS WisdomTree S&P China 500 UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.33% | 1.02% | 1.19% | 2.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CNYA iShares MSCI China A ETF | 3.98% | 4.23% | 2.69% | 1.11% | 1.06% | 1.21% | 3.92% | 0.97% | 1.38% |
Drawdowns
CHIN.L vs. CNYA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHIN.L drawdown since its inception was -56.80%, which is greater than CNYA's maximum drawdown of -49.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHIN.L and CNYA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CHIN.L vs. CNYA - Volatility Comparison
ICBC Credit Suisse UCITS ETF SICAV - ICBCCS WisdomTree S&P China 500 UCITS ETF (CHIN.L) and iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA) have volatilities of 4.54% and 4.73%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.