CEBG.L vs. JRCE.L
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A (CEBG.L) and JPMorgan China A Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JRCE.L).
CEBG.L and JRCE.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CEBG.L is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MSCI China NR USD. It was launched on Sep 24, 2021. JRCE.L is a passively managed fund by JPMorgan that tracks the performance of the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. It was launched on Feb 15, 2022. Both CEBG.L and JRCE.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CEBG.L vs. JRCE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CEBG.L vs. JRCE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEBG.L VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A | -2.72% | 15.45% | 1.26% | -14.25% | -10.95% |
JRCE.L JPMorgan China A Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) | 1.10% | 19.75% | 11.38% | -17.74% | -9.39% |
Different Trading Currencies
CEBG.L is traded in GBP, while JRCE.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the JRCE.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEBG.L achieves a -2.72% return, which is significantly lower than JRCE.L's 1.10% return.
CEBG.L
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- -3.60%
- YTD
- -2.72%
- 6M
- -9.29%
- 1Y
- 7.90%
- 3Y*
- -2.89%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JRCE.L
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -4.43%
- YTD
- 1.10%
- 6M
- 4.02%
- 1Y
- 23.80%
- 3Y*
- 2.98%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CEBG.L vs. JRCE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEBG.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than JRCE.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CEBG.L vs. JRCE.L — Risk / Return Rank
CEBG.L
JRCE.L
CEBG.L vs. JRCE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A (CEBG.L) and JPMorgan China A Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JRCE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEBG.L | JRCE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.43 | 1.53 | -1.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.67 | 2.05 | -1.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.28 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.61 | 2.77 | -2.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.71 | 8.19 | -6.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEBG.L | JRCE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 | 1.53 | -1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.15 | 0.01 | -0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between CEBG.L and JRCE.L is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CEBG.L vs. JRCE.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CEBG.L nor JRCE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
CEBG.L vs. JRCE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEBG.L drawdown since its inception was -46.41%, which is greater than JRCE.L's maximum drawdown of -36.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEBG.L and JRCE.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEBG.L | JRCE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.41% | -36.68% | -9.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.28% | -8.58% | -4.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.36% | -5.10% | -18.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.50% | -18.24% | -6.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.76% | 2.90% | +1.86% |
Volatility
CEBG.L vs. JRCE.L - Volatility Comparison
VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A (CEBG.L) has a higher volatility of 5.64% compared to JPMorgan China A Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JRCE.L) at 5.06%. This indicates that CEBG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JRCE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CEBG.L | JRCE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.64% | 5.06% | +0.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.62% | 10.90% | +0.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.33% | 15.55% | +2.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.60% | 21.67% | +2.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.60% | 21.67% | +2.93% |