CHIN.DE vs. CNAA.DE
CHIN.DE (KraneShares ICBCCS S&P China 500 Index UCITS ETF USD) and CNAA.DE (Amundi MSCI China A UCITS ETF Acc) are both China Equities funds - CHIN.DE tracks the S&P China 500 Index while CNAA.DE tracks the MSCI China A. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CHIN.DE returned 26.49% vs 33.60% for CNAA.DE. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CHIN.DE charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CNAA.DE.
Performance
CHIN.DE vs. CNAA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHIN.DE achieves a 6.22% return, which is significantly lower than CNAA.DE's 9.91% return.
CHIN.DE
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- -0.17%
- YTD
- 6.22%
- 6M
- 6.27%
- 1Y
- 26.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CNAA.DE
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 9.91%
- 6M
- 11.19%
- 1Y
- 33.60%
- 3Y*
- 8.43%
- 5Y*
- -0.21%
- 10Y*
- —
CHIN.DE vs. CNAA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CHIN.DE KraneShares ICBCCS S&P China 500 Index UCITS ETF USD | 6.22% | 16.60% | 23.10% | -6.61% |
CNAA.DE Amundi MSCI China A UCITS ETF Acc | 9.91% | 10.09% | 19.81% | -6.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHIN.DE and CNAA.DE is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2023 | 0.88 |
The correlation between CHIN.DE and CNAA.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHIN.DE vs. CNAA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CHIN.DE
CNAA.DE
CHIN.DE vs. CNAA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares ICBCCS S&P China 500 Index UCITS ETF USD (CHIN.DE) and Amundi MSCI China A UCITS ETF Acc (CNAA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CHIN.DE | CNAA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.37 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | 5.08 | -2.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.15 | 13.52 | -5.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CHIN.DE | CNAA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57 | 2.04 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.29 | +0.35 |
Drawdowns
CHIN.DE vs. CNAA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHIN.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.95%, smaller than the maximum CNAA.DE drawdown of -43.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHIN.DE and CNAA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHIN.DE | CNAA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.95% | -43.90% | +20.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.84% | -6.65% | -2.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -41.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.48% | -11.33% | +7.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.69% | -19.23% | +11.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.29% | 2.50% | +0.79% |
Volatility
CHIN.DE vs. CNAA.DE - Volatility Comparison
KraneShares ICBCCS S&P China 500 Index UCITS ETF USD (CHIN.DE) and Amundi MSCI China A UCITS ETF Acc (CNAA.DE) have volatilities of 6.18% and 6.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHIN.DE | CNAA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.18% | 6.13% | +0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.00% | 11.38% | +0.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.09% | 16.52% | +0.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.41% | 21.44% | +0.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.41% | 22.51% | -0.10% |
CHIN.DE vs. CNAA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHIN.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than CNAA.DE's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
CHIN.DE vs. CNAA.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CHIN.DE nor CNAA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CHIN.DE and CNAA.DE have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CNAA.DE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CNAA.DE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for CHIN.DE.
CHIN.DE tracks S&P China 500 Index, while CNAA.DE tracks MSCI China A. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for CHIN.DE and 0.35% for CNAA.DE.
Find the right allocation for CHIN.DE and CNAA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer