PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHILX vs. TDF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CHILX vs. TDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund (CHILX) and Templeton Dragon Fund Inc. (TDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHILX achieves a 13.53% return, which is significantly higher than TDF's -0.13% return.


CHILX

1D
-0.17%
1M
2.68%
YTD
13.53%
6M
17.77%
1Y
40.36%
3Y*
13.43%
5Y*
0.52%
10Y*

TDF

1D
-0.62%
1M
-0.68%
YTD
-0.13%
6M
0.86%
1Y
17.13%
3Y*
8.06%
5Y*
-8.78%
10Y*
4.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHILX vs. TDF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CHILX
BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund
13.53%26.30%15.44%-12.29%-28.54%3.54%48.69%48.44%
TDF
Templeton Dragon Fund Inc.
-0.13%37.70%5.44%-20.06%-32.93%-18.02%52.98%32.73%

Correlation

The correlation between CHILX and TDF is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2019

0.66

The correlation between CHILX and TDF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CHILX vs. TDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHILX
CHILX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
CHILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHILX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
CHILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHILX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

TDF
TDF Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
TDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDF Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
TDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDF Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHILX vs. TDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund (CHILX) and Templeton Dragon Fund Inc. (TDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CHILXTDFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.18

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.90

1.23

+3.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.73

3.44

+12.29

CHILX vs. TDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHILX Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is higher than the TDF Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHILX and TDF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CHILXTDFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.54

0.94

+1.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

-0.32

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.29

+0.27

Drawdowns

CHILX vs. TDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHILX drawdown since its inception was -47.73%, smaller than the maximum TDF drawdown of -68.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHILX and TDF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CHILXTDFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.73%

-68.15%

+20.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.54%

-13.95%

+5.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.59%

-28.25%

+5.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.88%

-61.85%

+17.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.02%

-45.78%

+40.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.46%

-22.57%

+2.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.66%

5.00%

-2.34%

Volatility

CHILX vs. TDF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund (CHILX) is 6.05%, while Templeton Dragon Fund Inc. (TDF) has a volatility of 6.59%. This indicates that CHILX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CHILXTDFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.05%

6.59%

-0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.86%

12.69%

-0.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.51%

18.41%

-1.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.27%

27.19%

-6.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.83%

23.94%

-2.11%

Dividends

CHILX vs. TDF - Dividend Comparison

CHILX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, less than TDF's 3.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CHILX
BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund
2.59%2.94%2.11%2.02%0.92%1.19%3.64%12.77%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TDF
Templeton Dragon Fund Inc.
3.59%3.55%1.36%0.00%12.73%14.13%24.72%10.75%12.43%7.95%10.34%22.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


CHILX and TDF have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TDF has higher volatility (6.59%) compared to CHILX (6.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHILX dropped -47.73% vs TDF's -68.15%.

CHILX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CHILX and TDF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer