CHILX vs. AFTY
CHILX (BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund) and AFTY (Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF) are both China Equities funds. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CHILX charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for AFTY.
Performance
CHILX vs. AFTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CHILX
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 1.54%
- YTD
- 12.02%
- 6M
- 16.64%
- 1Y
- 40.72%
- 3Y*
- 12.93%
- 5Y*
- 0.26%
- 10Y*
- —
AFTY
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CHILX vs. AFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHILX BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund | 12.02% | 26.30% | 15.44% | -12.29% | -28.54% | 3.54% | 48.69% | 48.44% |
AFTY Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 20.48% | -12.80% | -22.47% | -7.37% | 33.77% | 45.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHILX and AFTY is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2019 | 0.73 |
The correlation between CHILX and AFTY shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (3 years) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHILX vs. AFTY — Risk / Return Rank
CHILX
AFTY
CHILX vs. AFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund (CHILX) and Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CHILX | AFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.49 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.34 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.63 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.92 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CHILX | AFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | — | — |
Drawdowns
CHILX vs. AFTY - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHILX | AFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.54% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.28% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.48% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.65% | — | — |
Volatility
CHILX vs. AFTY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHILX | AFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.89% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.82% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.48% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.27% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.84% | — | — |
CHILX vs. AFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHILX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than AFTY's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
CHILX vs. AFTY - Dividend Comparison
CHILX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, while AFTY has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFTY Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.23% | 2.08% | 1.84% | 1.48% | 7.96% | 1.85% | 6.62% | 1.19% | 16.76% |
CHILX BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund | 2.62% | 2.94% | 2.11% | 2.02% | 0.92% | 1.19% | 3.64% | 12.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHILX and AFTY have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CHILX and AFTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer