TDF vs. FHKCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Templeton Dragon Fund Inc. (TDF) and Fidelity China Region Fund (FHKCX).
TDF is managed by Franklin Templeton Investments. FHKCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 1, 1995.
Performance
TDF vs. FHKCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TDF vs. FHKCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TDF Templeton Dragon Fund Inc. | -4.88% | 37.70% | 5.44% | -20.06% | -32.93% | -18.02% | 52.98% | 27.97% | -11.80% | 42.09% |
FHKCX Fidelity China Region Fund | 5.51% | 42.56% | 23.15% | -0.29% | -23.87% | -13.69% | 47.85% | 35.12% | -17.43% | 51.94% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TDF achieves a -4.88% return, which is significantly lower than FHKCX's 5.51% return. Over the past 10 years, TDF has underperformed FHKCX with an annualized return of 4.59%, while FHKCX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.16% annualized return.
TDF
- 1D
- 1.82%
- 1M
- -7.19%
- YTD
- -4.88%
- 6M
- -7.24%
- 1Y
- 13.51%
- 3Y*
- 2.14%
- 5Y*
- -9.72%
- 10Y*
- 4.59%
FHKCX
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- -9.04%
- YTD
- 5.51%
- 6M
- 6.28%
- 1Y
- 43.83%
- 3Y*
- 19.86%
- 5Y*
- 2.80%
- 10Y*
- 12.16%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TDF vs. FHKCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Return for Risk
TDF vs. FHKCX — Risk / Return Rank
TDF
FHKCX
TDF vs. FHKCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Templeton Dragon Fund Inc. (TDF) and Fidelity China Region Fund (FHKCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TDF | FHKCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.63 | 1.87 | -1.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.95 | 2.41 | -1.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.35 | -0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.78 | 2.51 | -1.74 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.60 | 9.74 | -7.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TDF | FHKCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 | 1.87 | -1.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.36 | 0.12 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 | 0.55 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.40 | -0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between TDF and FHKCX is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
TDF vs. FHKCX - Dividend Comparison
TDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%, more than FHKCX's 1.66% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TDF Templeton Dragon Fund Inc. | 3.77% | 3.55% | 1.36% | 0.00% | 12.73% | 14.13% | 24.72% | 10.75% | 12.43% | 7.95% | 10.34% | 22.49% |
FHKCX Fidelity China Region Fund | 1.66% | 1.75% | 1.39% | 1.92% | 1.05% | 10.77% | 4.85% | 0.66% | 0.83% | 0.39% | 1.35% | 15.47% |
Drawdowns
TDF vs. FHKCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TDF drawdown since its inception was -68.15%, which is greater than FHKCX's maximum drawdown of -61.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDF and FHKCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TDF | FHKCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.15% | -61.96% | -6.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.05% | -15.94% | -0.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -62.07% | -53.82% | -8.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.87% | -58.41% | -8.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.36% | -10.80% | -37.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.44% | -20.37% | -2.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.80% | 4.12% | +0.68% |
Volatility
TDF vs. FHKCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Templeton Dragon Fund Inc. (TDF) is 6.03%, while Fidelity China Region Fund (FHKCX) has a volatility of 9.27%. This indicates that TDF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FHKCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TDF | FHKCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.03% | 9.27% | -3.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.48% | 16.45% | -3.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.72% | 23.16% | -1.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.18% | 23.97% | +3.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.88% | 22.10% | +1.78% |