CHILX vs. FFANX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

CHILX (BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund) and FFANX (Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund) are both mutual funds - CHILX is a China Equities fund managed by BlackRock, while FFANX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by BlackRock. Over the past 5 years, CHILX returned 0.92%/yr vs 5.08%/yr for FFANX. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CHILX charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for FFANX.

Performance

CHILX vs. FFANX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund (CHILX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHILX achieves a 14.29% return, which is significantly higher than FFANX's 6.38% return.

CHILX

• 1D: -3.04%
• 1M: 2.37%
• YTD: 14.29%
• 6M: 14.50%
• 1Y: 38.98%
• 3Y*: 14.64%
• 5Y*: 0.92%
• 10Y*: —

FFANX

• 1D: -1.00%
• 1M: 0.40%
• YTD: 6.38%
• 6M: 6.02%
• 1Y: 14.49%
• 3Y*: 10.91%
• 5Y*: 5.08%
• 10Y*: 6.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHILX vs. FFANX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
CHILX BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund	14.29%	26.30%	15.44%	-12.29%	-28.54%	3.54%	48.69%	48.44%
FFANX Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund	6.38%	13.16%	7.40%	11.52%	-13.62%	8.03%	13.10%	15.81%

Correlation

The correlation between CHILX and FFANX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.34
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2019	0.45

The correlation between CHILX and FFANX shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (3 years) to 0.46 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CHILX vs. FFANX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHILX

CHILX Risk / Return Rank: 78
CHILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
CHILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
CHILX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
CHILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
CHILX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

FFANX

FFANX Risk / Return Rank: 67
FFANX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
FFANX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
FFANX Omega Ratio Rank: 68
FFANX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
FFANX Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHILX vs. FFANX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund (CHILX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CHILX	FFANX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.32	2.15	+0.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.07	3.06	0.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.42	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.86	2.95	+1.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.80	12.54	+2.26

CHILX vs. FFANX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHILX Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is comparable to the FFANX Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHILX and FFANX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CHILX vs. FFANX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHILX drawdown since its inception was -47.73%, which is greater than FFANX's maximum drawdown of -31.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHILX and FFANX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CHILX	FFANX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.73%	-31.69%	-16.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.54%	-5.20%	-3.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.59%	-7.55%	-15.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.88%	-18.52%	-25.36%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-18.52%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.39%	-1.13%	-3.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.35%	-3.79%	-16.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.80%	1.22%	+1.58%

Volatility

CHILX vs. FFANX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund (CHILX) has a higher volatility of 8.17% compared to Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX) at 3.12%. This indicates that CHILX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFANX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CHILX	FFANX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.17%	3.12%	+5.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.73%	6.09%	+7.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.91%	7.15%	+10.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.45%	7.95%	+12.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.91%	7.73%	+14.18%

CHILX vs. FFANX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHILX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FFANX's 0.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

CHILX vs. FFANX - Dividend Comparison

CHILX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, less than FFANX's 3.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CHILX BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund	2.57%	2.94%	2.11%	2.02%	0.92%	1.19%	3.64%	12.77%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FFANX Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund	3.69%	3.97%	2.81%	2.49%	5.75%	2.35%	2.36%	3.67%	4.56%	2.56%	1.43%	3.18%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CHILX and FFANX in my portfolio?

CHILX and FFANX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CHILX or FFANX?

CHILX has higher volatility (8.17%) compared to FFANX (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHILX dropped -47.73% vs FFANX's -31.69%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CHILX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.