CHGX vs. SGRT

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Change Finance U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free ETF (CHGX) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT).

CHGX and SGRT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CHGX is a passively managed fund by Change Finance that tracks the performance of the Change Finance Diversified Impact U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free Index. It was launched on Oct 10, 2017.

Performance

CHGX vs. SGRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Change Finance U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free ETF (CHGX) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CHGX vs. SGRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CHGX Change Finance U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free ETF	-0.47%	3.09%
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF	9.56%	25.25%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHGX achieves a -0.47% return, which is significantly lower than SGRT's 9.56% return.

CHGX

• 1D: 0.90%
• 1M: -4.75%
• YTD: -0.47%
• 6M: -0.77%
• 1Y: 15.00%
• 3Y*: 14.28%
• 5Y*: 7.48%
• 10Y*: —

SGRT

• 1D: 2.70%
• 1M: -6.90%
• YTD: 9.56%
• 6M: 15.63%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHGX vs. SGRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHGX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than SGRT's 0.59% expense ratio.

SGRT

SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF

CHGX

Change Finance U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free ETF

Return for Risk

CHGX vs. SGRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHGX

CHGX Risk / Return Rank: 45
CHGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
CHGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
CHGX Omega Ratio Rank: 42
CHGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
CHGX Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHGX vs. SGRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Change Finance U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free ETF (CHGX) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CHGX	SGRT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.83	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.27	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.31	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.53	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CHGX	SGRT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.58	2.09	-1.50

Correlation

The correlation between CHGX and SGRT is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

CHGX vs. SGRT - Dividend Comparison

CHGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, more than SGRT's 0.15% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CHGX Change Finance U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free ETF	0.68%	0.67%	0.76%	0.94%	1.11%	0.56%	0.58%	0.86%	0.00%	0.59%
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF	0.15%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

CHGX vs. SGRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHGX drawdown since its inception was -35.49%, which is greater than SGRT's maximum drawdown of -17.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHGX and SGRT.

Drawdown Indicators

	CHGX	SGRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.49%	-17.87%	-17.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.51%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.26%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.08%	-7.09%	+2.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.55%	-3.52%	-3.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.72%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CHGX	SGRT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.52%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.66%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.24%	32.60%	-14.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.48%	32.60%	-15.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.42%	32.60%	-13.18%