PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHGX vs. QARP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CHGX vs. QARP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Change Finance U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free ETF (CHGX) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHGX achieves a 19.58% return, which is significantly higher than QARP's 12.78% return.


CHGX

1D
0.03%
1M
-2.14%
6M
16.55%
YTD
19.58%
1Y
26.18%
3Y*
17.56%
5Y*
9.83%
10Y*

QARP

1D
0.71%
1M
1.10%
6M
9.34%
YTD
12.78%
1Y
25.00%
3Y*
17.33%
5Y*
12.09%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHGX vs. QARP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
CHGX
Change Finance U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free ETF
19.58%12.13%15.16%23.65%-21.77%22.72%24.10%33.07%-4.04%
QARP
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF
12.78%13.99%18.94%23.03%-14.62%31.82%14.83%30.70%-5.53%

Correlation

The correlation between CHGX and QARP is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2018

0.84

The correlation between CHGX and QARP shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.90 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CHGX vs. QARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CHGX
QARP

Technology

30.6%
23.5%

Financial Services

17.7%
12.1%

Healthcare

15.7%
13.9%

Consumer Cyclical

12.0%
9.6%

Communication Services

8.0%
11.3%

Industrials

5.8%
8.5%

Real Estate

4.1%
1.0%

Basic Materials

3.3%
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

2.9%
9.6%

Energy

2.2%
5.8%

Utilities

1.0%
2.0%

Technology

CHGX
30.6%
QARP
23.5%

Financial Services

CHGX
17.7%
QARP
12.1%

Healthcare

CHGX
15.7%
QARP
13.9%

Consumer Cyclical

CHGX
12.0%
QARP
9.6%

Communication Services

CHGX
8.0%
QARP
11.3%

Industrials

CHGX
5.8%
QARP
8.5%

Real Estate

CHGX
4.1%
QARP
1.0%

Basic Materials

CHGX
3.3%
QARP
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

CHGX
2.9%
QARP
9.6%

Energy

CHGX
2.2%
QARP
5.8%

Utilities

CHGX
1.0%
QARP
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CHGX vs. QARP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHGX
CHGX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
CHGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
CHGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

QARP
QARP Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
QARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
QARP Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
QARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
QARP Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHGX vs. QARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Change Finance U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free ETF (CHGX) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CHGXQARPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.43

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.09

3.46

-0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.59

15.38

-3.79

CHGX vs. QARP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the QARP Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHGX and QARP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CHGX vs. QARP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHGX drawdown since its inception was -35.49%, roughly equal to the maximum QARP drawdown of -35.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHGX and QARP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CHGXQARPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.49%

-35.44%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.50%

-7.26%

-1.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.09%

-15.65%

-2.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.26%

-22.75%

-7.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.99%

0.00%

-2.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.37%

-4.39%

-1.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.26%

1.63%

+0.63%

Volatility

CHGX vs. QARP - Volatility Comparison

Change Finance U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free ETF (CHGX) has a higher volatility of 3.54% compared to Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) at 2.76%. This indicates that CHGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CHGXQARPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.54%

2.76%

+0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.74%

8.22%

+3.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.55%

10.58%

+3.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.73%

15.54%

+2.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.33%

19.55%

-0.22%

CHGX vs. QARP - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHGX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than QARP's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

CHGX vs. QARP - Dividend Comparison

CHGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than QARP's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CHGX
Change Finance U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free ETF
0.56%0.67%0.76%0.94%1.11%0.56%0.58%0.86%0.00%0.59%
QARP
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF
1.02%1.14%1.39%1.28%1.68%1.34%1.61%1.85%1.39%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CHGX and QARP have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CHGX has higher volatility (3.54%) compared to QARP (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHGX dropped -35.49% vs QARP's -35.44%.

On 5-year performance, QARP leads with 12.09% vs 9.83% for CHGX. On fees, QARP is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, QARP has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QARP has performed better with a 12.09% return vs 9.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QARP is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for CHGX.

QARP has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.56% for CHGX.

CHGX tracks Change Finance Diversified Impact U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free Index, while QARP tracks Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Change Finance and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for CHGX and 0.19% for QARP.

QARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CHGX and QARP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer