CHGX vs. QARP
CHGX (Change Finance U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free ETF) and QARP (Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - CHGX tracks the Change Finance Diversified Impact U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free Index while QARP tracks the Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CHGX returned 9.83%/yr vs 12.09%/yr for QARP. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CHGX charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for QARP.
Performance
CHGX vs. QARP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHGX achieves a 19.58% return, which is significantly higher than QARP's 12.78% return.
CHGX
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -2.14%
- 6M
- 16.55%
- YTD
- 19.58%
- 1Y
- 26.18%
- 3Y*
- 17.56%
- 5Y*
- 9.83%
- 10Y*
- —
QARP
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- 6M
- 9.34%
- YTD
- 12.78%
- 1Y
- 25.00%
- 3Y*
- 17.33%
- 5Y*
- 12.09%
- 10Y*
- —
CHGX vs. QARP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHGX Change Finance U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free ETF | 19.58% | 12.13% | 15.16% | 23.65% | -21.77% | 22.72% | 24.10% | 33.07% | -4.04% |
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF | 12.78% | 13.99% | 18.94% | 23.03% | -14.62% | 31.82% | 14.83% | 30.70% | -5.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHGX and QARP is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2018 | 0.84 |
The correlation between CHGX and QARP shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.90 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CHGX vs. QARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CHGX
QARP
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Technology
CHGX
QARP
Financial Services
CHGX
QARP
Healthcare
CHGX
QARP
Consumer Cyclical
CHGX
QARP
Communication Services
CHGX
QARP
Industrials
CHGX
QARP
Real Estate
CHGX
QARP
Basic Materials
CHGX
QARP
Consumer Defensive
CHGX
QARP
Energy
CHGX
QARP
Utilities
CHGX
QARP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHGX vs. QARP — Risk / Return Rank
CHGX
QARP
CHGX vs. QARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Change Finance U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free ETF (CHGX) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CHGX | QARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.43 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.09 | 3.46 | -0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.59 | 15.38 | -3.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CHGX vs. QARP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHGX drawdown since its inception was -35.49%, roughly equal to the maximum QARP drawdown of -35.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHGX and QARP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHGX | QARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.49% | -35.44% | -0.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.50% | -7.26% | -1.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.09% | -15.65% | -2.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.26% | -22.75% | -7.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.99% | 0.00% | -2.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.37% | -4.39% | -1.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.26% | 1.63% | +0.63% |
Volatility
CHGX vs. QARP - Volatility Comparison
Change Finance U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free ETF (CHGX) has a higher volatility of 3.54% compared to Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) at 2.76%. This indicates that CHGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHGX | QARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.54% | 2.76% | +0.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.74% | 8.22% | +3.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.55% | 10.58% | +3.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.73% | 15.54% | +2.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.33% | 19.55% | -0.22% |
CHGX vs. QARP - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHGX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than QARP's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
CHGX vs. QARP - Dividend Comparison
CHGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than QARP's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHGX Change Finance U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free ETF | 0.56% | 0.67% | 0.76% | 0.94% | 1.11% | 0.56% | 0.58% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.59% |
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF | 1.02% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.28% | 1.68% | 1.34% | 1.61% | 1.85% | 1.39% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHGX and QARP have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHGX has higher volatility (3.54%) compared to QARP (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHGX dropped -35.49% vs QARP's -35.44%.
On 5-year performance, QARP leads with 12.09% vs 9.83% for CHGX. On fees, QARP is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, QARP has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QARP has performed better with a 12.09% return vs 9.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QARP is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for CHGX.
QARP has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.56% for CHGX.
CHGX tracks Change Finance Diversified Impact U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free Index, while QARP tracks Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Change Finance and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for CHGX and 0.19% for QARP.
QARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CHGX and QARP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer