CHGX vs. IQM
Compare and contrast key facts about Change Finance U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free ETF (CHGX) and Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM).
CHGX and IQM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CHGX is a passively managed fund by Change Finance that tracks the performance of the Change Finance Diversified Impact U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free Index. It was launched on Oct 10, 2017. IQM is an actively managed fund by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Feb 25, 2020.
Performance
CHGX vs. IQM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CHGX vs. IQM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHGX Change Finance U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free ETF | -0.47% | 12.13% | 15.16% | 23.65% | -21.77% | 22.72% | 32.44% |
IQM Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF | 3.20% | 30.76% | 31.03% | 41.06% | -33.36% | 25.18% | 78.48% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHGX achieves a -0.47% return, which is significantly lower than IQM's 3.20% return.
CHGX
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- -4.75%
- YTD
- -0.47%
- 6M
- -0.77%
- 1Y
- 15.00%
- 3Y*
- 14.28%
- 5Y*
- 7.48%
- 10Y*
- —
IQM
- 1D
- 1.99%
- 1M
- -3.98%
- YTD
- 3.20%
- 6M
- 2.05%
- 1Y
- 57.05%
- 3Y*
- 26.96%
- 5Y*
- 15.40%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CHGX vs. IQM - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHGX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than IQM's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CHGX vs. IQM — Risk / Return Rank
CHGX
IQM
CHGX vs. IQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Change Finance U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free ETF (CHGX) and Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CHGX | IQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.83 | 1.72 | -0.89 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.27 | 2.33 | -1.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.33 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.31 | 4.00 | -2.69 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.53 | 12.47 | -6.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CHGX | IQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 | 1.72 | -0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.54 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.78 | -0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between CHGX and IQM is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CHGX vs. IQM - Dividend Comparison
CHGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, while IQM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHGX Change Finance U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free ETF | 0.68% | 0.67% | 0.76% | 0.94% | 1.11% | 0.56% | 0.58% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.59% |
IQM Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.17% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CHGX vs. IQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHGX drawdown since its inception was -35.49%, smaller than the maximum IQM drawdown of -44.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHGX and IQM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHGX | IQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.49% | -44.91% | +9.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.51% | -14.71% | +3.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.26% | -44.91% | +14.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.08% | -6.86% | +1.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.55% | -12.55% | +6.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.72% | 4.72% | -2.00% |
Volatility
CHGX vs. IQM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Change Finance U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free ETF (CHGX) is 5.52%, while Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM) has a volatility of 12.71%. This indicates that CHGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CHGX | IQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.52% | 12.71% | -7.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.66% | 23.53% | -12.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.24% | 33.40% | -15.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.48% | 28.67% | -11.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.42% | 30.73% | -11.31% |