CHGX vs. BBUS
CHGX (Change Finance U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free ETF) and BBUS (JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - CHGX tracks the Change Finance Diversified Impact U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free Index while BBUS tracks the Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CHGX returned 11.13%/yr vs 13.43%/yr for BBUS. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CHGX charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for BBUS.
Performance
CHGX vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHGX achieves a 22.80% return, which is significantly higher than BBUS's 10.60% return.
CHGX
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 10.61%
- YTD
- 22.80%
- 6M
- 22.28%
- 1Y
- 33.91%
- 3Y*
- 21.19%
- 5Y*
- 11.13%
- 10Y*
- —
BBUS
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 5.12%
- YTD
- 10.60%
- 6M
- 10.47%
- 1Y
- 27.47%
- 3Y*
- 22.46%
- 5Y*
- 13.43%
- 10Y*
- —
CHGX vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHGX Change Finance U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free ETF | 22.80% | 12.13% | 15.16% | 23.65% | -21.77% | 22.72% | 24.10% | 16.19% |
BBUS JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 10.60% | 17.77% | 24.89% | 27.20% | -19.46% | 27.13% | 20.69% | 16.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHGX and BBUS is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2019 | 0.93 |
The correlation between CHGX and BBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
CHGX vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CHGX
BBUS
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Technology
CHGX
BBUS
Financial Services
CHGX
BBUS
Healthcare
CHGX
BBUS
Consumer Cyclical
CHGX
BBUS
Communication Services
CHGX
BBUS
Industrials
CHGX
BBUS
Real Estate
CHGX
BBUS
Basic Materials
CHGX
BBUS
Consumer Defensive
CHGX
BBUS
Energy
CHGX
BBUS
Utilities
CHGX
BBUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHGX vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank
CHGX
BBUS
CHGX vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Change Finance U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free ETF (CHGX) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CHGX | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.42 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.01 | 3.00 | +1.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.81 | 13.76 | +2.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CHGX | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.49 | 2.33 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | 0.79 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.84 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
CHGX vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHGX drawdown since its inception was -35.49%, roughly equal to the maximum BBUS drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHGX and BBUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHGX | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.49% | -35.35% | -0.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.50% | -9.21% | +0.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.09% | -19.01% | +0.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.26% | -25.46% | -4.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.37% | -0.74% | +0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.43% | -5.46% | -0.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.15% | 2.00% | +0.15% |
Volatility
CHGX vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison
Change Finance U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free ETF (CHGX) has a higher volatility of 3.97% compared to JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) at 2.88%. This indicates that CHGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHGX | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.97% | 2.88% | +1.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.67% | 8.96% | +1.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.70% | 11.87% | +1.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.58% | 17.03% | +0.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.35% | 19.59% | -0.24% |
CHGX vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHGX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
CHGX vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison
CHGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than BBUS's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBUS JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 0.98% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.11% | 1.43% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CHGX Change Finance U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free ETF | 0.55% | 0.67% | 0.76% | 0.94% | 1.11% | 0.56% | 0.58% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHGX and BBUS have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHGX has higher volatility (3.97%) compared to BBUS (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHGX dropped -35.49% vs BBUS's -35.35%.
On 5-year performance, BBUS leads with 13.43% vs 11.13% for CHGX. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, BBUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 13.43% return vs 11.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for CHGX.
BBUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.55% for CHGX.
CHGX tracks Change Finance Diversified Impact U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free Index, while BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: Change Finance and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for CHGX and 0.02% for BBUS.
CHGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CHGX and BBUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer