PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHGX vs. ALTL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CHGX vs. ALTL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Change Finance U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free ETF (CHGX) and Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHGX achieves a 22.80% return, which is significantly higher than ALTL's 16.90% return.


CHGX

1D
-0.37%
1M
10.61%
YTD
22.80%
6M
22.28%
1Y
33.91%
3Y*
21.19%
5Y*
11.13%
10Y*

ALTL

1D
-0.66%
1M
12.43%
YTD
16.90%
6M
16.56%
1Y
44.84%
3Y*
13.86%
5Y*
5.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHGX vs. ALTL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
CHGX
Change Finance U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free ETF
22.80%12.13%15.16%23.65%-21.77%22.72%26.86%
ALTL
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF
16.90%16.61%12.30%-15.85%-10.67%45.30%33.74%

Correlation

The correlation between CHGX and ALTL is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2020

0.69

The correlation between CHGX and ALTL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

CHGX vs. ALTL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CHGX
ALTL

Technology

29.7%
4.6%

Financial Services

17.7%
16.6%

Healthcare

15.7%
6.8%

Consumer Cyclical

12.0%
5.7%

Communication Services

8.9%
0.8%

Industrials

5.8%
10.2%

Real Estate

4.1%
14.8%

Basic Materials

3.3%
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

2.9%
10.8%

Energy

2.2%
0.9%

Utilities

1.0%
26.8%

Technology

CHGX
29.7%
ALTL
4.6%

Financial Services

CHGX
17.7%
ALTL
16.6%

Healthcare

CHGX
15.7%
ALTL
6.8%

Consumer Cyclical

CHGX
12.0%
ALTL
5.7%

Communication Services

CHGX
8.9%
ALTL
0.8%

Industrials

CHGX
5.8%
ALTL
10.2%

Real Estate

CHGX
4.1%
ALTL
14.8%

Basic Materials

CHGX
3.3%
ALTL
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

CHGX
2.9%
ALTL
10.8%

Energy

CHGX
2.2%
ALTL
0.9%

Utilities

CHGX
1.0%
ALTL
26.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CHGX vs. ALTL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHGX
CHGX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
CHGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
CHGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

ALTL
ALTL Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
ALTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALTL Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
ALTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALTL Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHGX vs. ALTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Change Finance U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free ETF (CHGX) and Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CHGXALTLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.44

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.01

4.60

-0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.81

16.35

-0.53

CHGX vs. ALTL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the ALTL Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHGX and ALTL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CHGXALTLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

2.51

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.28

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.73

-0.01

Drawdowns

CHGX vs. ALTL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHGX drawdown since its inception was -35.49%, which is greater than ALTL's maximum drawdown of -31.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHGX and ALTL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CHGXALTLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.49%

-31.91%

-3.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.50%

-9.79%

+1.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.09%

-21.21%

+3.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.26%

-31.91%

+1.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-0.66%

+0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.43%

-11.58%

+5.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.15%

2.75%

-0.60%

Volatility

CHGX vs. ALTL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Change Finance U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free ETF (CHGX) is 3.97%, while Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL) has a volatility of 7.26%. This indicates that CHGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALTL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CHGXALTLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.97%

7.26%

-3.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.67%

10.97%

-0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.70%

18.05%

-4.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.58%

18.38%

-0.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.35%

20.09%

-0.74%

CHGX vs. ALTL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHGX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than ALTL's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

CHGX vs. ALTL - Dividend Comparison

CHGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than ALTL's 0.94% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
ALTL
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF
0.94%0.95%1.56%1.28%1.23%1.06%0.75%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CHGX
Change Finance U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free ETF
0.55%0.67%0.76%0.94%1.11%0.56%0.58%0.86%0.00%0.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


CHGX and ALTL have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ALTL has higher volatility (7.26%) compared to CHGX (3.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHGX dropped -35.49% vs ALTL's -31.91%.

On 5-year performance, CHGX leads with 11.13% vs 5.04% for ALTL. On fees, CHGX is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, CHGX has been the lower-risk option at 3.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, CHGX has performed better with a 11.13% return vs 5.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CHGX is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ALTL.

ALTL has the higher dividend yield at 0.94%, compared with 0.55% for CHGX.

CHGX tracks Change Finance Diversified Impact U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free Index, while ALTL tracks Lunt Capital US Large Cap Equity Rotation Index. They also come from different issuers: Change Finance and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for CHGX and 0.60% for ALTL.

ALTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CHGX and ALTL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer