PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHGG vs. SLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CHGG vs. SLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chegg, Inc. (CHGG) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHGG achieves a 35.48% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's 3.97% return. Over the past 10 years, CHGG has underperformed SLV with an annualized return of -12.81%, while SLV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.63% annualized return.


CHGG

1D
2.44%
1M
1.61%
YTD
35.48%
6M
40.23%
1Y
0.80%
3Y*
-48.97%
5Y*
-55.57%
10Y*
-12.81%

SLV

1D
1.16%
1M
1.62%
YTD
3.97%
6M
29.40%
1Y
113.72%
3Y*
45.73%
5Y*
21.04%
10Y*
15.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHGG vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CHGG
Chegg, Inc.
35.48%-42.24%-85.83%-55.05%-17.69%-66.01%138.27%33.39%74.14%121.14%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
3.97%144.66%20.89%-1.09%2.37%-12.45%47.30%14.88%-9.19%5.82%

Correlation

The correlation between CHGG and SLV is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2013

0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CHGG vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHGG
CHGG Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
CHGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHGG Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
CHGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHGG Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

SLV
SLV Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHGG vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chegg, Inc. (CHGG) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CHGGSLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.36

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.01

2.69

-2.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.02

5.76

-5.74

CHGG vs. SLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHGG Sharpe Ratio is 0.01, which is lower than the SLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHGG and SLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CHGGSLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

1.94

-1.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.63

0.58

-1.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.18

0.49

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.22

0.25

-0.47

Drawdowns

CHGG vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHGG drawdown since its inception was -99.60%, which is greater than SLV's maximum drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHGG and SLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CHGGSLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.60%

-76.28%

-23.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-75.54%

-42.45%

-33.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-96.06%

-42.45%

-53.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.50%

-42.45%

-57.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.60%

-42.81%

-56.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.89%

-36.57%

-62.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.36%

-44.67%

-0.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

43.09%

19.81%

+23.28%

Volatility

CHGG vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison

Chegg, Inc. (CHGG) has a higher volatility of 45.02% compared to iShares Silver Trust (SLV) at 16.34%. This indicates that CHGG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CHGGSLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

45.02%

16.34%

+28.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

77.98%

58.31%

+19.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

119.43%

58.90%

+60.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

88.19%

36.15%

+52.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

70.73%

31.83%

+38.90%

Dividends

CHGG vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison

Neither CHGG nor SLV has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CHGG and SLV have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CHGG has higher volatility (45.02%) compared to SLV (16.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHGG dropped -99.60% vs SLV's -76.28%.

SLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CHGG and SLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer