CHGG vs. PICK
CHGG (Chegg, Inc.) is a stock, while PICK (iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF) is Metals fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Select Metals & Mining Producers ex Gold and Silver Investable Market Index. Over the past 10 years, CHGG returned -17.73%/yr vs 14.33%/yr for PICK. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CHGG vs. PICK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHGG achieves a -16.18% return, which is significantly lower than PICK's 11.29% return. Over the past 10 years, CHGG has underperformed PICK with an annualized return of -17.73%, while PICK has yielded a comparatively higher 14.33% annualized return.
CHGG
- 1D
- -6.84%
- 1M
- -32.80%
- 6M
- -11.42%
- YTD
- -16.18%
- 1Y
- -45.11%
- 3Y*
- -55.95%
- 5Y*
- -60.55%
- 10Y*
- -17.73%
PICK
- 1D
- -2.73%
- 1M
- -13.63%
- 6M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- 11.29%
- 1Y
- 49.28%
- 3Y*
- 13.90%
- 5Y*
- 9.56%
- 10Y*
- 14.33%
CHGG vs. PICK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHGG Chegg, Inc. | -16.18% | -42.24% | -85.83% | -55.05% | -17.69% | -66.01% | 138.27% | 33.39% | 74.14% | 121.14% |
PICK iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF | 11.29% | 51.89% | -16.37% | 9.69% | 2.54% | 22.61% | 27.46% | 16.47% | -18.65% | 38.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHGG and PICK is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2013 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHGG vs. PICK — Risk / Return Rank
CHGG
PICK
CHGG vs. PICK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chegg, Inc. (CHGG) and iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CHGG | PICK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.29 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.60 | 2.53 | -3.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.01 | 7.54 | -8.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CHGG vs. PICK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHGG drawdown since its inception was -99.60%, which is greater than PICK's maximum drawdown of -68.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHGG and PICK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHGG | PICK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.60% | -68.87% | -30.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -75.54% | -19.54% | -56.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -96.06% | -32.52% | -63.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.50% | -36.37% | -63.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.60% | -52.72% | -46.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.31% | -17.11% | -82.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.14% | -24.02% | -24.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 44.90% | 6.55% | +38.35% |
Volatility
CHGG vs. PICK - Volatility Comparison
Chegg, Inc. (CHGG) has a higher volatility of 24.05% compared to iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) at 8.43%. This indicates that CHGG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PICK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHGG | PICK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.05% | 8.43% | +15.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 79.88% | 26.74% | +53.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 113.70% | 30.28% | +83.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 88.90% | 28.19% | +60.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.11% | 28.28% | +42.83% |
Dividends
CHGG vs. PICK - Dividend Comparison
CHGG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PICK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHGG Chegg, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PICK iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF | 2.33% | 2.88% | 3.26% | 4.19% | 6.93% | 5.89% | 2.27% | 5.51% | 4.77% | 2.41% | 1.15% | 15.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHGG and PICK have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHGG has higher volatility (24.05%) compared to PICK (8.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHGG dropped -99.60% vs PICK's -68.87%.
PICK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CHGG and PICK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer