CHGG vs. PICK
CHGG (Chegg, Inc.) is a stock, while PICK (iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF) is Metals fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Select Metals & Mining Producers ex Gold and Silver Investable Market Index. Over the past 10 years, CHGG returned -14.11%/yr vs 16.39%/yr for PICK. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CHGG vs. PICK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CHGG having a 13.98% return and PICK slightly higher at 14.51%. Over the past 10 years, CHGG has underperformed PICK with an annualized return of -14.11%, while PICK has yielded a comparatively higher 16.39% annualized return.
CHGG
- 1D
- -1.85%
- 1M
- -31.61%
- YTD
- 13.98%
- 6M
- 16.74%
- 1Y
- -21.48%
- 3Y*
- -50.74%
- 5Y*
- -58.19%
- 10Y*
- -14.11%
PICK
- 1D
- -2.43%
- 1M
- -7.52%
- YTD
- 14.51%
- 6M
- 14.07%
- 1Y
- 63.17%
- 3Y*
- 17.30%
- 5Y*
- 9.85%
- 10Y*
- 16.39%
CHGG vs. PICK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHGG Chegg, Inc. | 13.98% | -42.24% | -85.83% | -55.05% | -17.69% | -66.01% | 138.27% | 33.39% | 74.14% | 121.14% |
PICK iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF | 14.51% | 51.89% | -16.37% | 9.69% | 2.54% | 22.61% | 27.46% | 16.47% | -18.65% | 38.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHGG and PICK is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2013 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHGG vs. PICK — Risk / Return Rank
CHGG
PICK
CHGG vs. PICK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chegg, Inc. (CHGG) and iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CHGG | PICK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.36 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.29 | 3.25 | -3.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.50 | 12.00 | -12.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CHGG vs. PICK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHGG drawdown since its inception was -99.60%, which is greater than PICK's maximum drawdown of -68.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHGG and PICK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHGG | PICK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.60% | -68.87% | -30.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -75.54% | -19.54% | -56.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -96.06% | -32.52% | -63.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.50% | -36.37% | -63.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.60% | -52.72% | -46.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.07% | -14.71% | -84.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.90% | -24.05% | -23.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 43.33% | 5.28% | +38.05% |
Volatility
CHGG vs. PICK - Volatility Comparison
Chegg, Inc. (CHGG) has a higher volatility of 24.94% compared to iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) at 13.30%. This indicates that CHGG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PICK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHGG | PICK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.94% | 13.30% | +11.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 78.85% | 26.68% | +52.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 113.66% | 30.24% | +83.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 88.49% | 28.15% | +60.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 70.92% | 28.34% | +42.58% |
Dividends
CHGG vs. PICK - Dividend Comparison
CHGG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PICK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHGG Chegg, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PICK iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF | 2.26% | 2.88% | 3.26% | 4.19% | 6.93% | 5.89% | 2.27% | 5.51% | 4.77% | 2.41% | 1.15% | 15.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHGG and PICK have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHGG has higher volatility (24.94%) compared to PICK (13.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHGG dropped -99.60% vs PICK's -68.87%.
PICK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CHGG and PICK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer