CHAU vs. OOQB
Compare and contrast key facts about Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares (CHAU) and Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB).
CHAU and OOQB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CHAU is a passively managed fund by Direxion that tracks the performance of the CSI 300 Index (200%). It was launched on Apr 16, 2015. OOQB is an actively managed fund by Volatility Shares. It was launched on Feb 18, 2025.
Performance
CHAU vs. OOQB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CHAU vs. OOQB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CHAU Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares | -3.54% | 45.53% |
OOQB Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF | -28.65% | -13.30% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHAU achieves a -3.54% return, which is significantly higher than OOQB's -28.65% return.
CHAU
- 1D
- -1.08%
- 1M
- -3.65%
- YTD
- -3.54%
- 6M
- -2.05%
- 1Y
- 46.05%
- 3Y*
- -0.80%
- 5Y*
- -10.81%
- 10Y*
- 2.26%
OOQB
- 1D
- -1.69%
- 1M
- -5.30%
- YTD
- -28.65%
- 6M
- -48.97%
- 1Y
- -20.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CHAU vs. OOQB - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHAU has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than OOQB's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CHAU vs. OOQB — Risk / Return Rank
CHAU
OOQB
CHAU vs. OOQB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares (CHAU) and Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CHAU | OOQB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.26 | -0.35 | +1.61 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.73 | -0.13 | +1.86 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 0.98 | +0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | -0.33 | +2.41 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.32 | -0.73 | +9.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CHAU | OOQB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.26 | -0.35 | +1.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.23 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.10 | -0.57 | +0.46 |
Correlation
The correlation between CHAU and OOQB is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CHAU vs. OOQB - Dividend Comparison
CHAU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%, less than OOQB's 13.89% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHAU Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares | 2.11% | 1.97% | 2.25% | 3.97% | 0.77% | 1.73% | 0.09% | 0.58% | 0.83% |
OOQB Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF | 13.89% | 9.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CHAU vs. OOQB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHAU drawdown since its inception was -79.21%, which is greater than OOQB's maximum drawdown of -53.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHAU and OOQB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHAU | OOQB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.21% | -53.44% | -25.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.48% | -53.44% | +32.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -74.32% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.07% | -50.75% | -10.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.96% | -20.16% | -38.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.50% | 24.40% | -18.90% |
Volatility
CHAU vs. OOQB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares (CHAU) is 9.56%, while Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB) has a volatility of 16.29%. This indicates that CHAU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OOQB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CHAU | OOQB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.56% | 16.29% | -6.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.50% | 46.00% | -23.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.75% | 59.49% | -22.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.96% | 61.79% | -14.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.24% | 61.79% | -14.55% |