PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHAU vs. SPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CHAU vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares (CHAU) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHAU achieves a 3.41% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 10.13% return. Over the past 10 years, CHAU has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 3.36%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.07% annualized return.


CHAU

1D
-0.55%
1M
-6.06%
6M
0.47%
YTD
3.41%
1Y
41.75%
3Y*
6.15%
5Y*
-8.33%
10Y*
3.36%
ALL TIME*
-4.90%

SPY

1D
0.72%
1M
0.30%
6M
8.53%
YTD
10.13%
1Y
21.49%
3Y*
19.32%
5Y*
12.76%
10Y*
15.07%
ALL TIME*
10.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.26M$3.47M$3.01M
$37.27B$35.99B$39.23B

CHAU vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CHAU
Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares
3.41%47.73%6.61%-28.25%-49.17%-2.84%71.95%70.01%-51.03%74.91%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
10.13%17.72%24.89%26.18%-18.18%28.73%18.33%31.22%-4.57%21.71%

Correlation

The correlation between CHAU and SPY is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2015

0.40

The correlation between CHAU and SPY shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (3 years) to 0.46 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CHAU vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CHAU
SPY

Technology

36.3%
36.9%

Financial Services

17.8%
12.5%

Industrials

15.6%
7.6%

Basic Materials

9.1%
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

5.6%
4.8%

Consumer Cyclical

5.3%
8.9%

Healthcare

3.9%
9.4%

Utilities

2.6%
2.6%

Energy

2.3%
3.4%

Communication Services

1.1%
9.7%

Real Estate

0.3%
2.0%

Technology

CHAU
36.3%
SPY
36.9%

Financial Services

CHAU
17.8%
SPY
12.5%

Industrials

CHAU
15.6%
SPY
7.6%

Basic Materials

CHAU
9.1%
SPY
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

CHAU
5.6%
SPY
4.8%

Consumer Cyclical

CHAU
5.3%
SPY
8.9%

Healthcare

CHAU
3.9%
SPY
9.4%

Utilities

CHAU
2.6%
SPY
2.6%

Energy

CHAU
2.3%
SPY
3.4%

Communication Services

CHAU
1.1%
SPY
9.7%

Real Estate

CHAU
0.3%
SPY
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CHAU vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CHAU
CHAU Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
CHAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHAU Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
CHAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHAU Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY
SPY Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CHAU vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares (CHAU) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CHAUSPYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.27

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

2.20

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.94

9.40

-3.46

CHAU vs. SPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHAU Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is lower than the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHAU and SPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CHAU vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHAU drawdown since its inception was -79.21%, which is greater than SPY's maximum drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHAU and SPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CHAUSPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.21%

-55.19%

-24.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.27%

-8.88%

-10.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-59.88%

-18.76%

-41.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-71.83%

-24.50%

-47.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-78.58%

-33.72%

-44.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-58.27%

-1.40%

-56.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.83%

-9.01%

-49.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.79%

2.08%

+4.71%

Volatility

CHAU vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares (CHAU) has a higher volatility of 17.39% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 3.58%. This indicates that CHAU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CHAUSPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.39%

3.58%

+13.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.77%

10.14%

+20.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.40%

12.89%

+26.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.27%

17.18%

+30.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.45%

17.95%

+29.50%

CHAU vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHAU has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

CHAU vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

CHAU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, more than SPY's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CHAU
Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares
2.09%1.97%2.25%3.97%0.77%1.73%0.09%0.58%0.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
1.01%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


CHAU and SPY have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CHAU has higher volatility (17.39%) compared to SPY (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHAU dropped -79.21% vs SPY's -55.19%.

On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.07% vs 3.36% for CHAU. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 3.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.07% return vs 3.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 1.21% for CHAU.

CHAU has the higher dividend yield at 2.09%, compared with 1.01% for SPY.

CHAU is categorized as China Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. CHAU tracks CSI 300 Index (200%), while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.21% for CHAU and 0.09% for SPY.

SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CHAU and SPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer