CHAU vs. QYLG

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

CHAU (Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares) and QYLG (Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CHAU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the CSI 300 Index (200%), while QYLG is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE Nasdaq-100 BuyWrite V2 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CHAU returned -9.25%/yr vs 13.49%/yr for QYLG. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CHAU charges 1.21%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QYLG.

Performance

CHAU vs. QYLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares (CHAU) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHAU achieves a 17.88% return, which is significantly higher than QYLG's 14.80% return.

CHAU

• 1D: 4.14%
• 1M: 3.96%
• YTD: 17.88%
• 6M: 24.97%
• 1Y: 83.14%
• 3Y*: 13.00%
• 5Y*: -9.25%
• 10Y*: 4.55%

QYLG

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: 6.20%
• YTD: 14.80%
• 6M: 15.22%
• 1Y: 33.88%
• 3Y*: 21.42%
• 5Y*: 13.49%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHAU vs. QYLG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CHAU Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares	17.88%	47.73%	6.61%	-28.25%	-49.17%	-2.84%	35.85%
QYLG Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF	14.80%	15.29%	22.02%	38.73%	-26.27%	18.29%	12.52%

Correlation

The correlation between CHAU and QYLG is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.26
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2020	0.31

The correlation between CHAU and QYLG shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (3 years) to 0.38 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CHAU vs. QYLG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CHAU	QYLG
Technology	26.3%	53.7%
Financial Services	20.4%	0.2%
Industrials	16.7%	2.9%
Basic Materials	10.7%	1.1%
Consumer Defensive	7.3%	7.7%
Consumer Cyclical	6.7%	12.3%
Healthcare	4.9%	4.2%
Utilities	3.0%	1.4%
Energy	2.7%	0.6%
Communication Services	0.8%	15.8%
Real Estate	0.5%	0.1%

Return for Risk

CHAU vs. QYLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHAU

CHAU Risk / Return Rank: 76
CHAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
CHAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
CHAU Omega Ratio Rank: 65
CHAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
CHAU Martin Ratio Rank: 81

QYLG

QYLG Risk / Return Rank: 83
QYLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
QYLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
QYLG Omega Ratio Rank: 83
QYLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
QYLG Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHAU vs. QYLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares (CHAU) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CHAU	QYLG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.50	2.80	-0.29
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.12	3.77	-0.65
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.51	-0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.49	4.11	+1.38
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	16.51	18.78	-2.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CHAU vs. QYLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHAU Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is comparable to the QYLG Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHAU and QYLG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CHAU	QYLG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.50	2.80	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.20	0.75	-0.95
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.10	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.07	0.83	-0.90

Drawdowns

CHAU vs. QYLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHAU drawdown since its inception was -79.21%, which is greater than QYLG's maximum drawdown of -29.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHAU and QYLG.

Drawdown Indicators

	CHAU	QYLG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.21%	-29.98%	-49.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.27%	-8.42%	-6.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-59.88%	-20.75%	-39.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-73.69%	-29.98%	-43.71%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-78.58%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-52.43%	0.00%	-52.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-58.90%	-6.42%	-52.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.08%	1.84%	+3.24%

Volatility

CHAU vs. QYLG - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares (CHAU) has a higher volatility of 11.80% compared to Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG) at 3.10%. This indicates that CHAU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CHAU	QYLG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.80%	3.10%	+8.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.83%	9.68%	+13.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.37%	12.18%	+21.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.09%	17.98%	+29.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.15%	17.93%	+29.22%

CHAU vs. QYLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHAU has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLG's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

CHAU vs. QYLG - Dividend Comparison

CHAU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, less than QYLG's 16.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CHAU Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares	1.73%	1.97%	2.25%	3.97%	0.77%	1.73%	0.09%	0.58%	0.83%
QYLG Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF	16.07%	17.93%	25.27%	5.43%	6.91%	10.15%	1.44%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CHAU and QYLG in my portfolio?

CHAU and QYLG have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CHAU or QYLG?

CHAU has higher volatility (11.80%) compared to QYLG (3.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHAU dropped -79.21% vs QYLG's -29.98%.

Which ETF is better, CHAU or QYLG?

On 5-year performance, QYLG leads with 13.49% vs -9.25% for CHAU. On fees, QYLG is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, QYLG has been the lower-risk option at 3.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CHAU or QYLG?

Over the 5-year period, QYLG has performed better with a 13.49% return vs -9.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CHAU or QYLG?

QYLG is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.21% for CHAU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CHAU or QYLG?

QYLG has the higher dividend yield at 16.07%, compared with 1.73% for CHAU.

What is the main difference between CHAU and QYLG?

CHAU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while QYLG is Nasdaq-100. CHAU tracks CSI 300 Index (200%), while QYLG tracks CBOE Nasdaq-100 BuyWrite V2 Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.21% for CHAU and 0.60% for QYLG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QYLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.