CHAU vs. FLCH

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

CHAU (Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares) and FLCH (Franklin FTSE China ETF) are both China Equities funds - CHAU tracks the CSI 300 Index (200%) while FLCH tracks the FTSE China RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CHAU returned -9.88%/yr vs -4.99%/yr for FLCH. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CHAU charges 1.21%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FLCH.

Performance

CHAU vs. FLCH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares (CHAU) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHAU achieves a 5.90% return, which is significantly higher than FLCH's -11.65% return.

CHAU

• 1D: -4.96%
• 1M: -5.32%
• 6M: -2.77%
• YTD: 5.90%
• 1Y: 46.02%
• 3Y*: 8.70%
• 5Y*: -9.88%
• 10Y*: 3.13%

FLCH

• 1D: -1.36%
• 1M: -3.67%
• 6M: -17.28%
• YTD: -11.65%
• 1Y: -1.70%
• 3Y*: 7.36%
• 5Y*: -4.99%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHAU vs. FLCH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CHAU Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares	5.90%	47.73%	6.61%	-28.25%	-49.17%	-2.84%	71.95%	70.01%	-51.03%	5.21%
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF	-11.65%	32.55%	18.00%	-11.21%	-22.74%	-20.87%	30.09%	24.32%	-19.52%	1.51%

Correlation

The correlation between CHAU and FLCH is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.75
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017	0.78

The correlation between CHAU and FLCH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

CHAU vs. FLCH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CHAU	FLCH
Technology	31.1%	13.9%
Financial Services	19.1%	18.3%
Industrials	16.1%	11.1%
Basic Materials	9.4%	5.2%
Consumer Defensive	6.7%	3.2%
Consumer Cyclical	6.4%	20.0%
Healthcare	4.4%	5.7%
Utilities	3.1%	1.8%
Energy	2.5%	3.3%
Communication Services	0.8%	14.9%
Real Estate	0.4%	1.6%

Return for Risk

CHAU vs. FLCH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHAU

CHAU Risk / Return Rank: 52
CHAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
CHAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
CHAU Omega Ratio Rank: 42
CHAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
CHAU Martin Ratio Rank: 58

FLCH

FLCH Risk / Return Rank: 8
FLCH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
FLCH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
FLCH Omega Ratio Rank: 8
FLCH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
FLCH Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHAU vs. FLCH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares (CHAU) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CHAU	FLCH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.23	-0.09	+1.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.79	0.01	+1.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.00	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.03	-0.08	+3.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.95	-0.18	+8.13

CHAU vs. FLCH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHAU Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is higher than the FLCH Sharpe Ratio of -0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHAU and FLCH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CHAU vs. FLCH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHAU drawdown since its inception was -79.21%, which is greater than FLCH's maximum drawdown of -62.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHAU and FLCH.

Drawdown Indicators

	CHAU	FLCH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.21%	-62.09%	-17.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.27%	-21.48%	+6.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-59.88%	-25.43%	-34.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-71.97%	-53.29%	-18.68%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-78.58%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-57.26%	-37.72%	-19.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-58.83%	-30.60%	-28.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.81%	9.46%	-3.65%

Volatility

CHAU vs. FLCH - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares (CHAU) has a higher volatility of 17.36% compared to Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) at 5.45%. This indicates that CHAU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLCH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CHAU	FLCH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.36%	5.45%	+11.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.48%	13.87%	+14.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.60%	19.59%	+18.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.52%	29.57%	+17.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.35%	27.81%	+19.54%

CHAU vs. FLCH - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHAU has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

CHAU vs. FLCH - Dividend Comparison

CHAU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, less than FLCH's 2.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CHAU Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares	2.04%	1.97%	2.25%	3.97%	0.77%	1.73%	0.09%	0.58%	0.83%	0.00%
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF	2.45%	2.36%	2.87%	3.47%	2.69%	1.48%	0.91%	1.98%	1.92%	0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CHAU and FLCH in my portfolio?

CHAU and FLCH have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CHAU or FLCH?

CHAU has higher volatility (17.36%) compared to FLCH (5.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHAU dropped -79.21% vs FLCH's -62.09%.

Which ETF is better, CHAU or FLCH?

On 5-year performance, FLCH leads with -4.99% vs -9.88% for CHAU. On fees, FLCH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, FLCH has been the lower-risk option at 5.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CHAU or FLCH?

Over the 5-year period, FLCH has performed better with a -4.99% return vs -9.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CHAU or FLCH?

FLCH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 1.21% for CHAU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CHAU or FLCH?

FLCH has the higher dividend yield at 2.45%, compared with 2.04% for CHAU.

What is the main difference between CHAU and FLCH?

CHAU tracks CSI 300 Index (200%), while FLCH tracks FTSE China RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 1.21% for CHAU and 0.19% for FLCH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CHAU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.