PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHAU vs. CN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CHAU vs. CN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares (CHAU) and Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CHAU

1D
-4.96%
1M
-5.32%
6M
-2.77%
YTD
5.90%
1Y
46.02%
3Y*
8.70%
5Y*
-9.88%
10Y*
3.13%

CN

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHAU vs. CN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CHAU
Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares
5.90%47.73%6.61%-28.25%-49.17%-2.84%71.95%70.01%-51.03%74.91%
CN
Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF
0.00%0.00%-3.10%-11.87%-23.85%-12.74%31.55%26.79%-22.41%43.69%

Correlation

The correlation between CHAU and CN is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2015

0.75

The correlation between CHAU and CN shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (3 years) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CHAU vs. CN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CHAU
CN

Technology

31.1%
0.3%

Financial Services

19.1%
55.1%

Industrials

16.1%
1.0%

Basic Materials

9.4%
0.6%

Consumer Defensive

6.7%
0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

6.4%
5.4%

Healthcare

4.4%
0.8%

Utilities

3.1%
0.2%

Energy

2.5%
0.9%

Communication Services

0.8%
0.4%

Real Estate

0.4%
0.8%

Technology

CHAU
31.1%
CN
0.3%

Financial Services

CHAU
19.1%
CN
55.1%

Industrials

CHAU
16.1%
CN
1.0%

Basic Materials

CHAU
9.4%
CN
0.6%

Consumer Defensive

CHAU
6.7%
CN
0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

CHAU
6.4%
CN
5.4%

Healthcare

CHAU
4.4%
CN
0.8%

Utilities

CHAU
3.1%
CN
0.2%

Energy

CHAU
2.5%
CN
0.9%

Communication Services

CHAU
0.8%
CN
0.4%

Real Estate

CHAU
0.4%
CN
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CHAU vs. CN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHAU
CHAU Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
CHAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHAU Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
CHAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHAU Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

CN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHAU vs. CN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares (CHAU) and Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CHAUCNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.95

CHAU vs. CN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CHAU vs. CN - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CHAUCNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-59.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-71.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-78.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-57.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.81%

Volatility

CHAU vs. CN - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CHAUCNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.35%

CHAU vs. CN - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHAU has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than CN's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

CHAU vs. CN - Dividend Comparison

CHAU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, while CN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CHAU
Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares
2.04%1.97%2.25%3.97%0.77%1.73%0.09%0.58%0.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CN
Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%4.04%1.80%2.00%0.78%4.18%2.09%0.81%11.41%14.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CHAU and CN have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.21% for CHAU.

CHAU has the higher dividend yield at 2.04%, compared with 0.00% for CN.

CHAU tracks CSI 300 Index (200%), while CN tracks MSCI China All Shares. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 1.21% for CHAU and 0.50% for CN.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CHAU and CN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer