CHAT vs. RDTE

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CHAT (Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF) and RDTE (Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CHAT is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while RDTE is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CHAT returned 115.67% vs 30.49% for RDTE. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CHAT charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for RDTE.

Performance

CHAT vs. RDTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) and Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHAT achieves a 63.45% return, which is significantly higher than RDTE's 16.99% return.

CHAT

• 1D: -7.40%
• 1M: 7.27%
• YTD: 63.45%
• 6M: 62.78%
• 1Y: 115.67%
• 3Y*: 51.32%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RDTE

• 1D: -0.88%
• 1M: 5.32%
• YTD: 16.99%
• 6M: 14.85%
• 1Y: 30.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHAT vs. RDTE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	63.45%	49.85%	21.90%
RDTE Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	16.99%	9.46%	8.32%

Correlation

The correlation between CHAT and RDTE is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2024	0.64

The correlation between CHAT and RDTE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CHAT vs. RDTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHAT

CHAT Risk / Return Rank: 89
CHAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
CHAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
CHAT Omega Ratio Rank: 85
CHAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
CHAT Martin Ratio Rank: 90

RDTE

RDTE Risk / Return Rank: 58
RDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
RDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
RDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 49
RDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
RDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHAT vs. RDTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) and Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CHAT	RDTE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.34	1.78	+1.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.54	2.42	+1.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.30	+0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.14	3.34	+3.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.81	11.57	+8.24

CHAT vs. RDTE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHAT Sharpe Ratio is 3.34, which is higher than the RDTE Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHAT and RDTE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CHAT vs. RDTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHAT drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, which is greater than RDTE's maximum drawdown of -24.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHAT and RDTE.

Drawdown Indicators

	CHAT	RDTE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.34%	-24.32%	-7.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.28%	-9.17%	-7.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.34%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.40%	-0.88%	-6.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.38%	-4.55%	-0.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.86%	2.64%	+3.22%

Volatility

CHAT vs. RDTE - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) has a higher volatility of 19.25% compared to Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTE) at 6.08%. This indicates that CHAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RDTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CHAT	RDTE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.25%	6.08%	+13.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.60%	13.07%	+16.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.87%	17.25%	+17.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.22%	19.30%	+11.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.22%	19.30%	+11.92%

CHAT vs. RDTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHAT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than RDTE's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

CHAT vs. RDTE - Dividend Comparison

CHAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, less than RDTE's 44.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	1.74%	2.85%	0.00%
RDTE Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	44.14%	50.16%	10.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CHAT and RDTE in my portfolio?

CHAT and RDTE have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CHAT or RDTE?

CHAT has higher volatility (19.25%) compared to RDTE (6.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHAT dropped -31.34% vs RDTE's -24.32%.

Which ETF is better, CHAT or RDTE?

On 1-year performance, CHAT leads with 115.67% vs 30.49% for RDTE. On fees, CHAT is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, RDTE has been the lower-risk option at 6.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CHAT or RDTE?

Over the 1-year period, CHAT has performed better with a 115.67% return vs 30.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CHAT or RDTE?

CHAT is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for RDTE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CHAT or RDTE?

RDTE has the higher dividend yield at 44.14%, compared with 1.74% for CHAT.

What is the main difference between CHAT and RDTE?

CHAT is categorized as Technology Equities, while RDTE is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CHAT and 0.97% for RDTE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CHAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.34 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.