CHAT vs. DRAM

Last updated Aug 6, 2026

CHAT (Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF) and DRAM (Roundhill Memory ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CHAT is a Artificial Intelligence fund actively managed by Roundhill, while DRAM is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.88 means they have usually moved in the same direction. CHAT charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for DRAM.

Performance

CHAT vs. DRAM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) and Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CHAT

• 1D: -1.08%
• 1M: -2.08%
• 6M: 50.12%
• YTD: 51.14%
• 1Y: 78.97%
• 3Y*: 45.97%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 48.79%

DRAM

• 1D: -2.10%
• 1M: -17.02%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	$67.53M	$57.41M	$65.64M
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF	$4.16B	$4.38B	$3.61B

CHAT vs. DRAM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	38.61%
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF	99.04%

Correlation

The correlation between CHAT and DRAM is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026	0.88

CHAT vs. DRAM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CHAT	DRAM
Technology	78.9%	100.0%
Communication Services	15.2%	-
Industrials	3.6%	-
Consumer Cyclical	2.3%	-
Financial Services	0.0%	-2.3%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

CHAT vs. DRAM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CHAT

CHAT Risk / Return Rank: 69
CHAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
CHAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
CHAT Omega Ratio Rank: 66
CHAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
CHAT Martin Ratio Rank: 69

DRAM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CHAT vs. DRAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) and Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CHAT	DRAM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.01	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.43	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.80	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.68	—	—

Drawdowns

CHAT vs. DRAM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHAT drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, smaller than the maximum DRAM drawdown of -44.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHAT and DRAM.

Drawdown Indicators

	CHAT	DRAM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.34%	-44.44%	+13.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.34%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.34%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.37%	-33.42%	+19.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.77%	-11.32%	+5.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.18%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CHAT	DRAM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.97%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.87%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.55%	99.91%	-60.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.58%	99.91%	-67.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.58%	99.91%	-67.33%

CHAT vs. DRAM - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHAT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than DRAM's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

CHAT vs. DRAM - Dividend Comparison

CHAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, while DRAM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	1.89%	2.85%
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CHAT and DRAM in my portfolio?

CHAT and DRAM have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CHAT or DRAM?

On fees, DRAM is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CHAT or DRAM?

DRAM is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CHAT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CHAT or DRAM?

CHAT has the higher dividend yield at 1.89%, compared with 0.00% for DRAM.

What is the main difference between CHAT and DRAM?

CHAT is categorized as Artificial Intelligence, while DRAM is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CHAT and 0.65% for DRAM.