CHAT vs. DRAM

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CHAT (Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF) and DRAM (Roundhill Memory ETF) are both Technology Equities funds from Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CHAT charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for DRAM.

Performance

CHAT vs. DRAM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) and Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CHAT

• 1D: -7.40%
• 1M: 7.27%
• YTD: 63.45%
• 6M: 62.78%
• 1Y: 115.67%
• 3Y*: 51.32%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DRAM

• 1D: -14.25%
• 1M: 31.05%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHAT vs. DRAM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	49.90%
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF	156.37%

Correlation

The correlation between CHAT and DRAM is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026	0.88

CHAT vs. DRAM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CHAT	DRAM
Technology	77.8%	100.0%
Communication Services	16.1%	-
Industrials	3.5%	-
Consumer Cyclical	2.4%	-
Financial Services	0.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

CHAT vs. DRAM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHAT

CHAT Risk / Return Rank: 89
CHAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
CHAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
CHAT Omega Ratio Rank: 85
CHAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
CHAT Martin Ratio Rank: 90

DRAM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHAT vs. DRAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) and Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CHAT	DRAM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.34	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.54	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.14	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.81	—	—

Drawdowns

CHAT vs. DRAM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHAT drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, which is greater than DRAM's maximum drawdown of -19.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHAT and DRAM.

Drawdown Indicators

	CHAT	DRAM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.34%	-19.97%	-11.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.28%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.34%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.40%	-14.25%	+6.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.38%	-3.09%	-2.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.86%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CHAT	DRAM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.25%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.60%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.87%	93.22%	-58.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.22%	93.22%	-62.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.22%	93.22%	-62.00%

CHAT vs. DRAM - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHAT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than DRAM's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

CHAT vs. DRAM - Dividend Comparison

CHAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, while DRAM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	1.74%	2.85%
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CHAT and DRAM in my portfolio?

CHAT and DRAM have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CHAT or DRAM?

On fees, DRAM is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CHAT or DRAM?

DRAM is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CHAT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CHAT or DRAM?

CHAT has the higher dividend yield at 1.74%, compared with 0.00% for DRAM.

What is the main difference between CHAT and DRAM?

Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CHAT and 0.65% for DRAM.