CGXU vs. SBIT

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

CGXU (Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF) and SBIT (Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CGXU is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group, while SBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%). CGXU is actively managed, while SBIT is passively managed. Over the past year, CGXU returned 33.39% vs 98.77% for SBIT. Their -0.41 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. CGXU charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SBIT.

Performance

CGXU vs. SBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF (CGXU) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGXU achieves a 14.63% return, which is significantly lower than SBIT's 39.44% return.

CGXU

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: -1.88%
• 6M: 8.43%
• YTD: 14.63%
• 1Y: 33.39%
• 3Y*: 14.49%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.32%

SBIT

• 1D: 5.60%
• 1M: -6.04%
• 6M: 32.41%
• YTD: 39.44%
• 1Y: 98.77%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -42.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CGXU Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF	$32.56M	$32.77M	$32.34M
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF	$29.57M	$32.71M	$46.48M

CGXU vs. SBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CGXU Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF	14.63%	26.31%	-3.14%
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF	39.44%	-25.11%	-73.74%

Correlation

The correlation between CGXU and SBIT is -0.46, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024	-0.41

Return for Risk

CGXU vs. SBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CGXU

CGXU Risk / Return Rank: 64
CGXU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
CGXU Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
CGXU Omega Ratio Rank: 61
CGXU Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
CGXU Martin Ratio Rank: 67

SBIT

SBIT Risk / Return Rank: 55
SBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
SBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
SBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 52
SBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
SBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CGXU vs. SBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF (CGXU) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CGXU	SBIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.44	1.27	+0.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.03	1.95	+0.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.23	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.48	2.35	+0.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.13	5.19	+2.95

CGXU vs. SBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGXU Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the SBIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGXU and SBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CGXU vs. SBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGXU drawdown since its inception was -25.64%, smaller than the maximum SBIT drawdown of -91.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGXU and SBIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGXU	SBIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.64%	-91.35%	+65.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.14%	-47.94%	+34.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.63%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.17%	-77.87%	+71.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.57%	-69.07%	+62.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.99%	21.67%	-17.68%

Volatility

CGXU vs. SBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF (CGXU) is 7.13%, while Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) has a volatility of 18.09%. This indicates that CGXU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CGXU	SBIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.13%	18.09%	-10.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.04%	67.10%	-47.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.61%	88.65%	-66.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.41%	96.10%	-75.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.41%	96.10%	-75.69%

CGXU vs. SBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGXU has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than SBIT's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

CGXU vs. SBIT - Dividend Comparison

CGXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.04%, more than SBIT's 4.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CGXU Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF	5.04%	5.31%	1.01%	0.99%	0.95%
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF	4.03%	0.52%	1.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGXU and SBIT in my portfolio?

CGXU and SBIT have a correlation of -0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CGXU or SBIT?

SBIT has higher volatility (18.09%) compared to CGXU (7.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGXU dropped -25.64% vs SBIT's -91.35%.

Which ETF is better, CGXU or SBIT?

On 1-year performance, SBIT leads with 98.77% vs 33.39% for CGXU. On fees, CGXU is cheaper at 0.54% per year. On volatility, CGXU has been the lower-risk option at 7.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CGXU or SBIT?

Over the 1-year period, SBIT has performed better with a 98.77% return vs 33.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CGXU or SBIT?

CGXU is cheaper with a 0.54% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SBIT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CGXU or SBIT?

CGXU has the higher dividend yield at 5.04%, compared with 4.03% for SBIT.

What is the main difference between CGXU and SBIT?

CGXU is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while SBIT is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for CGXU and 0.95% for SBIT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CGXU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.