PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGXU vs. BUFI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CGXU vs. BUFI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF (CGXU) and AB International Buffer ETF (BUFI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGXU achieves a 19.90% return, which is significantly higher than BUFI's 4.92% return.


CGXU

1D
-1.14%
1M
10.58%
YTD
19.90%
6M
22.54%
1Y
41.14%
3Y*
18.00%
5Y*
10Y*

BUFI

1D
-0.31%
1M
1.83%
YTD
4.92%
6M
6.32%
1Y
12.80%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGXU vs. BUFI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CGXU
Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF
19.90%26.31%-5.37%
BUFI
AB International Buffer ETF
4.92%16.50%-1.31%

Correlation

The correlation between CGXU and BUFI is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2024

0.85

The correlation between CGXU and BUFI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CGXU vs. BUFI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGXU
CGXU Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
CGXU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGXU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGXU Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
CGXU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGXU Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFI
BUFI Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
BUFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFI Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFI Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGXU vs. BUFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF (CGXU) and AB International Buffer ETF (BUFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CGXUBUFIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.30

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.14

2.26

+0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.72

8.98

+2.74

CGXU vs. BUFI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGXU Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is higher than the BUFI Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGXU and BUFI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CGXUBUFIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09

1.53

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

1.50

-0.94

Drawdowns

CGXU vs. BUFI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGXU drawdown since its inception was -25.64%, which is greater than BUFI's maximum drawdown of -7.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGXU and BUFI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CGXUBUFIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.64%

-7.43%

-18.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.14%

-5.69%

-7.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.14%

-0.32%

-0.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.66%

-0.86%

-5.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.52%

1.43%

+2.09%

Volatility

CGXU vs. BUFI - Volatility Comparison

Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF (CGXU) has a higher volatility of 7.31% compared to AB International Buffer ETF (BUFI) at 2.20%. This indicates that CGXU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CGXUBUFIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.31%

2.20%

+5.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.05%

7.05%

+10.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.83%

8.43%

+11.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.93%

9.15%

+10.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.93%

9.15%

+10.78%

CGXU vs. BUFI - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGXU has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFI's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

CGXU vs. BUFI - Dividend Comparison

CGXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, while BUFI has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BUFI
AB International Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CGXU
Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF
4.43%5.31%1.01%0.99%0.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


CGXU and BUFI have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CGXU has higher volatility (7.31%) compared to BUFI (2.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGXU dropped -25.64% vs BUFI's -7.43%.

On 1-year performance, CGXU leads with 41.14% vs 12.80% for BUFI. On fees, CGXU is cheaper at 0.54% per year. On volatility, BUFI has been the lower-risk option at 2.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CGXU has performed better with a 41.14% return vs 12.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CGXU is cheaper with a 0.54% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for BUFI.

CGXU has the higher dividend yield at 4.43%, compared with 0.00% for BUFI.

CGXU is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while BUFI is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and AllianceBernstein. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for CGXU and 0.69% for BUFI.

CGXU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CGXU and BUFI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer