CGVV vs. IGF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CGVV (Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF) and IGF (iShares Global Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CGVV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group, while IGF is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Infrastructure Index. CGVV is actively managed, while IGF is passively managed. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CGVV charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for IGF.

Performance

CGVV vs. IGF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF (CGVV) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGVV achieves a 11.52% return, which is significantly higher than IGF's 8.05% return.

CGVV

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 1.42%
• YTD: 11.52%
• 6M: 11.41%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IGF

• 1D: -0.57%
• 1M: -1.85%
• YTD: 8.05%
• 6M: 7.91%
• 1Y: 15.30%
• 3Y*: 15.91%
• 5Y*: 10.15%
• 10Y*: 8.29%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGVV vs. IGF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CGVV Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF	11.52%	6.41%
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF	8.05%	6.34%

Correlation

The correlation between CGVV and IGF is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025	0.50

Return for Risk

CGVV vs. IGF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGF

IGF Risk / Return Rank: 44
IGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
IGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
IGF Omega Ratio Rank: 39
IGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
IGF Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGVV vs. IGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF (CGVV) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CGVV	IGF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.47	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.73	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.49	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.50	0.24	+1.26

Drawdowns

CGVV vs. IGF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGVV drawdown since its inception was -10.11%, smaller than the maximum IGF drawdown of -58.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGVV and IGF.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGVV	IGF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.11%	-58.33%	+48.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-5.87%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.28%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.83%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-42.11%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.10%	-4.43%	+3.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.66%	-11.87%	+10.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.90%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CGVV	IGF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.68%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.59%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.50%	10.49%	+3.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.50%	13.99%	-0.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.50%	16.83%	-3.33%

CGVV vs. IGF - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGVV has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than IGF's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

CGVV vs. IGF - Dividend Comparison

CGVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than IGF's 2.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CGVV Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF	0.51%	0.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF	2.98%	3.23%	3.21%	3.36%	2.67%	2.42%	2.33%	3.27%	3.52%	2.95%	2.98%	3.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGVV and IGF in my portfolio?

CGVV and IGF have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CGVV or IGF?

On fees, CGVV is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CGVV or IGF?

CGVV is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for IGF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CGVV or IGF?

IGF has the higher dividend yield at 2.98%, compared with 0.51% for CGVV.

What is the main difference between CGVV and IGF?

CGVV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while IGF is Industrials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for CGVV and 0.39% for IGF.