CGUS vs. GXLC

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

CGUS (Capital Group Core Equity ETF) and GXLC (Global X U.S. 500 ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. CGUS is actively managed, while GXLC is passively managed. Their 0.96 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. CGUS charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for GXLC.

Performance

CGUS vs. GXLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Core Equity ETF (CGUS) and Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGUS achieves a 13.18% return, which is significantly higher than GXLC's 11.54% return.

CGUS

• 1D: 1.45%
• 1M: 2.67%
• 6M: 10.76%
• YTD: 13.18%
• 1Y: 22.06%
• 3Y*: 21.59%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 16.87%

GXLC

• 1D: 1.34%
• 1M: 1.54%
• 6M: 9.67%
• YTD: 11.54%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CGUS Capital Group Core Equity ETF	$56.62M	$48.62M	$48.21M
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF	$25.69K	$21.89K	$18.29K

CGUS vs. GXLC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CGUS Capital Group Core Equity ETF	13.18%	2.43%
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF	11.54%	3.22%

Correlation

The correlation between CGUS and GXLC is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025	0.96

Return for Risk

CGUS vs. GXLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CGUS

CGUS Risk / Return Rank: 70
CGUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
CGUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
CGUS Omega Ratio Rank: 69
CGUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
CGUS Martin Ratio Rank: 78

GXLC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CGUS vs. GXLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Core Equity ETF (CGUS) and Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CGUS	GXLC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.66	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.31	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.31	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.37	—	—

Drawdowns

CGUS vs. GXLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGUS drawdown since its inception was -21.86%, which is greater than GXLC's maximum drawdown of -9.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGUS and GXLC.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGUS	GXLC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.86%	-9.08%	-12.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.59%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.06%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.16%	+0.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.52%	-1.57%	-2.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.13%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CGUS	GXLC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.89%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.63%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.35%	13.64%	-0.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.43%	13.64%	+2.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.43%	13.64%	+2.79%

CGUS vs. GXLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGUS has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than GXLC's 0.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

CGUS vs. GXLC - Dividend Comparison

CGUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, more than GXLC's 0.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CGUS Capital Group Core Equity ETF	0.82%	0.95%	1.02%	1.22%	1.10%
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF	0.63%	0.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGUS and GXLC in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, CGUS and GXLC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, CGUS or GXLC?

On fees, GXLC is cheaper at 0.02% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CGUS or GXLC?

GXLC is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for CGUS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CGUS or GXLC?

CGUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.82%, compared with 0.63% for GXLC.

What is the main difference between CGUS and GXLC?

They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for CGUS and 0.02% for GXLC.