PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGUS vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CGUS vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Core Equity ETF (CGUS) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CGUS having a 10.75% return and VOO slightly higher at 10.91%.


CGUS

1D
0.14%
1M
4.22%
YTD
10.75%
6M
11.32%
1Y
27.33%
3Y*
22.65%
5Y*
10Y*

VOO

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.04%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.93%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.44%
5Y*
13.90%
10Y*
15.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGUS vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CGUS
Capital Group Core Equity ETF
10.75%16.21%24.89%27.72%-7.94%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.91%17.82%24.98%26.32%-9.28%

Correlation

The correlation between CGUS and VOO is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022

0.97

The correlation between CGUS and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

CGUS vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CGUS
VOO

Technology

38.4%
35.7%

Financial Services

10.8%
11.6%

Communication Services

9.9%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%
10.2%

Industrials

9.6%
8.3%

Healthcare

8.3%
8.5%

Energy

3.7%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.3%
4.9%

Basic Materials

2.5%
1.8%

Real Estate

2.1%
1.9%

Utilities

1.7%
2.4%

Technology

CGUS
38.4%
VOO
35.7%

Financial Services

CGUS
10.8%
VOO
11.6%

Communication Services

CGUS
9.9%
VOO
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

CGUS
9.8%
VOO
10.2%

Industrials

CGUS
9.6%
VOO
8.3%

Healthcare

CGUS
8.3%
VOO
8.5%

Energy

CGUS
3.7%
VOO
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

CGUS
3.3%
VOO
4.9%

Basic Materials

CGUS
2.5%
VOO
1.8%

Real Estate

CGUS
2.1%
VOO
1.9%

Utilities

CGUS
1.7%
VOO
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CGUS vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGUS
CGUS Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
CGUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
CGUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGUS vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Core Equity ETF (CGUS) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CGUSVOODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.23

2.39

-0.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.01

3.25

-0.24

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.43

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

3.16

-0.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.65

14.73

-1.07

CGUS vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGUS and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CGUSVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.23

2.39

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

0.89

+0.10

Drawdowns

CGUS vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGUS drawdown since its inception was -21.86%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGUS and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CGUSVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.86%

-33.99%

+12.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.59%

-8.90%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.06%

-18.69%

+0.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.70%

+0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.65%

-3.69%

-0.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

1.91%

+0.15%

Volatility

CGUS vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Capital Group Core Equity ETF (CGUS) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) have volatilities of 2.77% and 2.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CGUSVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.77%

2.84%

-0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.47%

8.90%

+0.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.31%

11.80%

+0.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.38%

16.81%

-0.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.38%

18.01%

-1.63%

CGUS vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGUS has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

CGUS vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

CGUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than VOO's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CGUS
Capital Group Core Equity ETF
0.86%0.95%1.02%1.22%1.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, CGUS and VOO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VOO has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to CGUS (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGUS dropped -21.86% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 3-year performance, CGUS leads with 22.65% vs 22.44% for VOO. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, CGUS has performed better with a 22.65% return vs 22.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for CGUS.

VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.86% for CGUS.

CGUS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for CGUS and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CGUS and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer