CGUS vs. VOO
CGUS (Capital Group Core Equity ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CGUS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. CGUS is actively managed, while VOO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CGUS returned 22.65%/yr vs 22.44%/yr for VOO. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. CGUS charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
CGUS vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CGUS having a 10.75% return and VOO slightly higher at 10.91%.
CGUS
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 4.22%
- YTD
- 10.75%
- 6M
- 11.32%
- 1Y
- 27.33%
- 3Y*
- 22.65%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VOO
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 6M
- 10.93%
- 1Y
- 28.04%
- 3Y*
- 22.44%
- 5Y*
- 13.90%
- 10Y*
- 15.56%
CGUS vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGUS Capital Group Core Equity ETF | 10.75% | 16.21% | 24.89% | 27.72% | -7.94% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 10.91% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -9.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGUS and VOO is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022 | 0.97 |
The correlation between CGUS and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
CGUS vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CGUS
VOO
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
CGUS
VOO
Financial Services
CGUS
VOO
Communication Services
CGUS
VOO
Consumer Cyclical
CGUS
VOO
Industrials
CGUS
VOO
Healthcare
CGUS
VOO
Energy
CGUS
VOO
Consumer Defensive
CGUS
VOO
Basic Materials
CGUS
VOO
Real Estate
CGUS
VOO
Utilities
CGUS
VOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGUS vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
CGUS
VOO
CGUS vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Core Equity ETF (CGUS) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CGUS | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.23 | 2.39 | -0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.01 | 3.25 | -0.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.43 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.93 | 3.16 | -0.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.65 | 14.73 | -1.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CGUS | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.23 | 2.39 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.99 | 0.89 | +0.10 |
Drawdowns
CGUS vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGUS drawdown since its inception was -21.86%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGUS and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGUS | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.86% | -33.99% | +12.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.59% | -8.90% | -0.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.06% | -18.69% | +0.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.70% | +0.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.65% | -3.69% | -0.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.06% | 1.91% | +0.15% |
Volatility
CGUS vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Capital Group Core Equity ETF (CGUS) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) have volatilities of 2.77% and 2.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGUS | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.77% | 2.84% | -0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.47% | 8.90% | +0.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.31% | 11.80% | +0.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.38% | 16.81% | -0.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.38% | 18.01% | -1.63% |
CGUS vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGUS has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
CGUS vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
CGUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than VOO's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGUS Capital Group Core Equity ETF | 0.86% | 0.95% | 1.02% | 1.22% | 1.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.03% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, CGUS and VOO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VOO has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to CGUS (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGUS dropped -21.86% vs VOO's -33.99%.
On 3-year performance, CGUS leads with 22.65% vs 22.44% for VOO. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CGUS has performed better with a 22.65% return vs 22.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for CGUS.
VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.86% for CGUS.
CGUS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for CGUS and 0.03% for VOO.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CGUS and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer