CGSD vs. SLON

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

CGSD (Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF) and SLON (ProShares Ultra Solana ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CGSD is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by Capital Group, while SLON is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Solana Index. CGSD is actively managed, while SLON is passively managed. Over the past year, CGSD returned 3.28% vs -90.71% for SLON. Their 0.12 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CGSD charges 0.25%/yr vs 2.14%/yr for SLON.

Performance

CGSD vs. SLON - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF (CGSD) and ProShares Ultra Solana ETF (SLON). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGSD achieves a 1.06% return, which is significantly higher than SLON's -75.40% return.

CGSD

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.05%
• 6M: 0.74%
• YTD: 1.06%
• 1Y: 3.28%
• 3Y*: 5.29%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 5.07%

SLON

• 1D: -3.99%
• 1M: -18.94%
• 6M: -70.99%
• YTD: -75.40%
• 1Y: -90.71%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -89.92%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CGSD Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF	$12.97M	$11.74M	$11.40M
SLON ProShares Ultra Solana ETF	$682.69K	$868.60K	$1.20M

CGSD vs. SLON - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CGSD Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF	1.06%	2.81%
SLON ProShares Ultra Solana ETF	-75.40%	-62.89%

Correlation

The correlation between CGSD and SLON is 0.11, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025	0.12

Return for Risk

CGSD vs. SLON — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CGSD

CGSD Risk / Return Rank: 92
CGSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
CGSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
CGSD Omega Ratio Rank: 95
CGSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
CGSD Martin Ratio Rank: 92

SLON

SLON Risk / Return Rank: 3
SLON Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
SLON Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
SLON Omega Ratio Rank: 3
SLON Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
SLON Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CGSD vs. SLON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF (CGSD) and ProShares Ultra Solana ETF (SLON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CGSD	SLON	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.61	-0.63	+3.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.09	-1.36	+5.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	0.85	+0.68
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.38	-0.95	+4.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.73	-1.19	+16.92

CGSD vs. SLON - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGSD Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is higher than the SLON Sharpe Ratio of -0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGSD and SLON, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CGSD vs. SLON - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGSD drawdown since its inception was -1.75%, smaller than the maximum SLON drawdown of -96.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGSD and SLON.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGSD	SLON	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.75%	-96.31%	+94.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.11%	-96.31%	+95.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.11%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.03%	-95.38%	+95.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.28%	-68.35%	+68.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.24%	77.06%	-76.82%

Volatility

CGSD vs. SLON - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF (CGSD) is 0.42%, while ProShares Ultra Solana ETF (SLON) has a volatility of 23.28%. This indicates that CGSD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLON based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CGSD	SLON	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.42%	23.28%	-22.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.10%	100.99%	-99.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.45%	144.72%	-143.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.14%	144.74%	-142.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.14%	144.74%	-142.60%

CGSD vs. SLON - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGSD has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than SLON's 2.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

CGSD vs. SLON - Dividend Comparison

CGSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, less than SLON's 23.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CGSD Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF	4.46%	4.48%	4.57%	4.43%	0.64%
SLON ProShares Ultra Solana ETF	23.34%	5.74%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGSD and SLON in my portfolio?

CGSD and SLON have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CGSD or SLON?

SLON has higher volatility (23.28%) compared to CGSD (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGSD dropped -1.75% vs SLON's -96.31%.

Which ETF is better, CGSD or SLON?

On 1-year performance, CGSD leads with 3.28% vs -90.71% for SLON. On fees, CGSD is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, CGSD has been the lower-risk option at 0.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CGSD or SLON?

Over the 1-year period, CGSD has performed better with a 3.28% return vs -90.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CGSD or SLON?

CGSD is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 2.14% for SLON.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CGSD or SLON?

SLON has the higher dividend yield at 23.34%, compared with 4.46% for CGSD.

What is the main difference between CGSD and SLON?

CGSD is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while SLON is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for CGSD and 2.14% for SLON.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CGSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.