PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGSD vs. BBBS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CGSD vs. BBBS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF (CGSD) and Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGSD achieves a 0.70% return, which is significantly lower than BBBS's 0.75% return.


CGSD

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.14%
YTD
0.70%
6M
1.09%
1Y
4.30%
3Y*
5.21%
5Y*
10Y*

BBBS

1D
0.00%
1M
0.26%
YTD
0.75%
6M
1.13%
1Y
4.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGSD vs. BBBS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CGSD and BBBS is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2024

0.76

The correlation between CGSD and BBBS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CGSD vs. BBBS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGSD
CGSD Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
CGSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGSD Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
CGSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGSD Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

BBBS
BBBS Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
BBBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBBS Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
BBBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBBS Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGSD vs. BBBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF (CGSD) and Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CGSDBBBSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.50

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.88

3.23

+0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.36

13.15

+5.21

CGSD vs. BBBS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGSD Sharpe Ratio is 2.94, which is comparable to the BBBS Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGSD and BBBS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CGSDBBBSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.94

2.50

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.41

2.36

+0.05

Drawdowns

CGSD vs. BBBS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGSD drawdown since its inception was -1.75%, which is greater than BBBS's maximum drawdown of -1.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGSD and BBBS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CGSDBBBSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.75%

-1.45%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.11%

-1.45%

+0.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-0.22%

+0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.28%

-0.28%

0.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.23%

0.35%

-0.12%

Volatility

CGSD vs. BBBS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF (CGSD) is 0.39%, while Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBS) has a volatility of 0.49%. This indicates that CGSD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CGSDBBBSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.39%

0.49%

-0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.01%

1.36%

-0.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.47%

1.87%

-0.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.16%

2.24%

-0.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.16%

2.24%

-0.08%

CGSD vs. BBBS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGSD has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than BBBS's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CGSD vs. BBBS - Dividend Comparison

CGSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, less than BBBS's 4.58% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BBBS
Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF
4.58%4.55%4.31%0.00%0.00%
CGSD
Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF
4.46%4.48%4.57%4.43%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


CGSD and BBBS have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBBS has higher volatility (0.49%) compared to CGSD (0.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGSD dropped -1.75% vs BBBS's -1.45%.

On 1-year performance, BBBS leads with 4.65% vs 4.30% for CGSD. On fees, BBBS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, CGSD has been the lower-risk option at 0.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BBBS has performed better with a 4.65% return vs 4.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBBS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CGSD.

BBBS has the higher dividend yield at 4.58%, compared with 4.46% for CGSD.

They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and BondBloxx. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for CGSD and 0.19% for BBBS.

CGSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 2.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CGSD and BBBS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer