CGMU vs. THYM
CGMU (Capital Group Municipal Income ETF) and THYM (T. Rowe Price High Income Municipal ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CGMU is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by Capital Group, while THYM is a High Yield Muni fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price. Both are actively managed. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CGMU charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for THYM.
Performance
CGMU vs. THYM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGMU achieves a 1.39% return, which is significantly lower than THYM's 3.33% return.
CGMU
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.45%
- YTD
- 1.39%
- 6M
- 1.79%
- 1Y
- 6.72%
- 3Y*
- 4.70%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
THYM
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 1.14%
- YTD
- 3.33%
- 6M
- 3.62%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CGMU vs. THYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CGMU Capital Group Municipal Income ETF | 1.39% | 0.50% |
THYM T. Rowe Price High Income Municipal ETF | 3.33% | 0.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGMU and THYM is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025 | 0.65 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGMU vs. THYM — Risk / Return Rank
CGMU
THYM
CGMU vs. THYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Municipal Income ETF (CGMU) and T. Rowe Price High Income Municipal ETF (THYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CGMU | THYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.94 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.18 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.64 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.65 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.61 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CGMU | THYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.94 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.66 | 1.62 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
CGMU vs. THYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGMU drawdown since its inception was -4.11%, which is greater than THYM's maximum drawdown of -2.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGMU and THYM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGMU | THYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.11% | -2.93% | -1.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.55% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.89% | 0.00% | -0.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.84% | -0.49% | -0.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.78% | — | — |
Volatility
CGMU vs. THYM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGMU | THYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.79% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.72% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.29% | 4.35% | -2.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.48% | 4.35% | -0.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.48% | 4.35% | -0.87% |
CGMU vs. THYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGMU has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than THYM's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
CGMU vs. THYM - Dividend Comparison
CGMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%, more than THYM's 2.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGMU Capital Group Municipal Income ETF | 3.33% | 3.32% | 3.21% | 3.08% | 0.49% |
THYM T. Rowe Price High Income Municipal ETF | 2.18% | 0.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGMU and THYM have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CGMU is cheaper at 0.27% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CGMU is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for THYM.
CGMU has the higher dividend yield at 3.33%, compared with 2.18% for THYM.
CGMU is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while THYM is High Yield Muni. They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for CGMU and 0.32% for THYM.
Find the right allocation for CGMU and THYM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer