PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
THYM vs. LMUB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

THYM vs. LMUB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price High Income Municipal ETF (THYM) and iShares Long-Term National Muni Bond ETF (LMUB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, THYM achieves a 2.25% return, which is significantly higher than LMUB's 0.34% return.


THYM

1D
0.00%
1M
-2.31%
6M
1.43%
YTD
2.25%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

LMUB

1D
-0.10%
1M
-2.97%
6M
-0.36%
YTD
0.34%
1Y
7.00%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$22.34M$14.18M$10.44M
$170.69K$138.29K$131.50K

THYM vs. LMUB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between THYM and LMUB is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025

0.58

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

THYM vs. LMUB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

THYM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


LMUB
LMUB Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
LMUB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMUB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMUB Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
LMUB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMUB Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

THYM vs. LMUB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price High Income Municipal ETF (THYM) and iShares Long-Term National Muni Bond ETF (LMUB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


THYMLMUBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.89

THYM vs. LMUB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

THYM vs. LMUB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THYM drawdown since its inception was -2.93%, smaller than the maximum LMUB drawdown of -5.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THYM and LMUB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


THYMLMUBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.93%

-5.51%

+2.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.31%

-2.97%

+0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.55%

-1.52%

+0.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.95%

Volatility

THYM vs. LMUB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


THYMLMUBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.41%

4.17%

+0.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.41%

5.75%

-1.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.41%

5.75%

-1.34%

THYM vs. LMUB - Expense Ratio Comparison

THYM has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than LMUB's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

THYM vs. LMUB - Dividend Comparison

THYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, less than LMUB's 3.85% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


THYM and LMUB have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LMUB is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LMUB is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for THYM.

LMUB has the higher dividend yield at 3.51%, compared with 2.99% for THYM.

THYM is categorized as High Yield Muni, while LMUB is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for THYM and 0.09% for LMUB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for THYM and LMUB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer