CGIE vs. QQQM
CGIE (Capital Group International Equity ETF) and QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CGIE is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group, while QQQM is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. CGIE is actively managed, while QQQM is passively managed. Over the past year, CGIE returned 12.69% vs 32.39% for QQQM. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CGIE charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QQQM.
Performance
CGIE vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGIE achieves a 4.31% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 15.99% return.
CGIE
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- YTD
- 4.31%
- 6M
- 3.99%
- 1Y
- 12.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQM
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -0.84%
- YTD
- 15.99%
- 6M
- 14.21%
- 1Y
- 32.39%
- 3Y*
- 25.97%
- 5Y*
- 16.03%
- 10Y*
- —
CGIE vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CGIE Capital Group International Equity ETF | 4.31% | 28.11% | 0.72% | 11.75% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 15.99% | 20.85% | 25.68% | 15.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGIE and QQQM is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2023 | 0.68 |
The correlation between CGIE and QQQM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
CGIE vs. QQQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CGIE
QQQM
Industrials
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Industrials
CGIE
QQQM
Financial Services
CGIE
QQQM
Technology
CGIE
QQQM
Healthcare
CGIE
QQQM
Consumer Defensive
CGIE
QQQM
Utilities
CGIE
QQQM
Basic Materials
CGIE
QQQM
Energy
CGIE
QQQM
Consumer Cyclical
CGIE
QQQM
Communication Services
CGIE
QQQM
Real Estate
CGIE
-
QQQM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGIE vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank
CGIE
QQQM
CGIE vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group International Equity ETF (CGIE) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CGIE | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.33 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.07 | 2.72 | -1.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.97 | 10.03 | -6.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CGIE vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGIE drawdown since its inception was -13.82%, smaller than the maximum QQQM drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGIE and QQQM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGIE | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.82% | -35.04% | +21.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.94% | -11.96% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.18% | -4.64% | +2.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.54% | -8.20% | +5.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.21% | 3.24% | -0.03% |
Volatility
CGIE vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Capital Group International Equity ETF (CGIE) is 5.70%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a volatility of 9.00%. This indicates that CGIE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGIE | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.70% | 9.00% | -3.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.40% | 14.39% | +0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.70% | 17.83% | -1.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.69% | 22.53% | -6.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.69% | 22.29% | -6.60% |
CGIE vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGIE has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
CGIE vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison
CGIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, more than QQQM's 0.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGIE Capital Group International Equity ETF | 1.12% | 1.17% | 1.27% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.45% | 0.50% | 0.61% | 0.65% | 0.83% | 0.40% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGIE and QQQM have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQM has higher volatility (9.00%) compared to CGIE (5.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGIE dropped -13.82% vs QQQM's -35.04%.
On 1-year performance, QQQM leads with 32.39% vs 12.69% for CGIE. On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, CGIE has been the lower-risk option at 5.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QQQM has performed better with a 32.39% return vs 12.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for CGIE.
CGIE has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 0.45% for QQQM.
CGIE is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while QQQM is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for CGIE and 0.15% for QQQM.
QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CGIE and QQQM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer