CGIE vs. QQQM

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Capital Group International Equity ETF (CGIE) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM).

CGIE and QQQM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CGIE is an actively managed fund by Capital Group. It was launched on Sep 26, 2023. QQQM is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Oct 13, 2020.

Performance

CGIE vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group International Equity ETF (CGIE) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CGIE vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CGIE Capital Group International Equity ETF	-1.12%	28.11%	0.72%	11.14%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	-4.75%	20.85%	25.68%	14.74%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGIE achieves a -1.12% return, which is significantly higher than QQQM's -4.75% return.

CGIE

• 1D: 1.80%
• 1M: -4.55%
• YTD: -1.12%
• 6M: 1.44%
• 1Y: 18.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQQM

• 1D: 1.24%
• 1M: -3.78%
• YTD: -4.75%
• 6M: -2.87%
• 1Y: 24.28%
• 3Y*: 22.91%
• 5Y*: 13.24%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGIE vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGIE has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio.

CGIE

Capital Group International Equity ETF

QQQM

Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF

Return for Risk

CGIE vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGIE

CGIE Risk / Return Rank: 56
CGIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
CGIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
CGIE Omega Ratio Rank: 52
CGIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
CGIE Martin Ratio Rank: 59

QQQM

QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 66
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 63
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGIE vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group International Equity ETF (CGIE) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CGIE	QQQM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.02	1.09	-0.07
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.50	1.68	-0.18
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.24	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.58	2.02	-0.44
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.18	7.35	-1.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CGIE vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGIE Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is comparable to the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGIE and QQQM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CGIE	QQQM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.02	1.09	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.60	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.99	0.64	+0.35

Correlation

The correlation between CGIE and QQQM is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

CGIE vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

CGIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, more than QQQM's 0.53% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CGIE Capital Group International Equity ETF	1.18%	1.17%	1.27%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	0.53%	0.50%	0.61%	0.65%	0.83%	0.40%	0.16%

Drawdowns

CGIE vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGIE drawdown since its inception was -13.82%, smaller than the maximum QQQM drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGIE and QQQM.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGIE	QQQM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.82%	-35.04%	+21.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.94%	-12.55%	+0.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-35.04%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.97%	-7.86%	+0.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.51%	-8.47%	+5.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.05%	3.44%	-0.39%

Volatility

CGIE vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

Capital Group International Equity ETF (CGIE) has a higher volatility of 7.97% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) at 6.58%. This indicates that CGIE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CGIE	QQQM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.97%	6.58%	+1.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.18%	12.79%	-0.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.91%	22.45%	-4.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.19%	22.24%	-7.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.19%	22.26%	-7.07%