PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGIE vs. EFA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CGIE vs. EFA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group International Equity ETF (CGIE) and iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CGIE vs. EFA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CGIE
Capital Group International Equity ETF
-1.12%28.11%0.72%11.14%
EFA
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
2.69%31.55%3.49%10.38%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGIE achieves a -1.12% return, which is significantly lower than EFA's 2.69% return.


CGIE

1D
1.80%
1M
-4.55%
YTD
-1.12%
6M
1.44%
1Y
18.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EFA

1D
1.52%
1M
-4.54%
YTD
2.69%
6M
6.65%
1Y
24.78%
3Y*
14.94%
5Y*
8.43%
10Y*
8.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CGIE vs. EFA - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGIE has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than EFA's 0.32% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CGIE vs. EFA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGIE
CGIE Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
CGIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGIE Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
CGIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGIE Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

EFA
EFA Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
EFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFA Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
EFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFA Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGIE vs. EFA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group International Equity ETF (CGIE) and iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CGIEEFADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.02

1.40

-0.38

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.50

1.99

-0.49

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.29

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.58

2.19

-0.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.18

8.30

-2.11

CGIE vs. EFA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGIE Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is comparable to the EFA Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGIE and EFA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CGIEEFADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.02

1.40

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

0.30

+0.69

Correlation

The correlation between CGIE and EFA is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

CGIE vs. EFA - Dividend Comparison

CGIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than EFA's 3.29% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CGIE
Capital Group International Equity ETF
1.18%1.17%1.27%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EFA
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
3.29%3.38%3.24%2.98%2.69%3.33%2.13%3.10%3.39%2.57%3.07%2.76%

Drawdowns

CGIE vs. EFA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGIE drawdown since its inception was -13.82%, smaller than the maximum EFA drawdown of -61.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGIE and EFA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CGIEEFADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.82%

-61.04%

+47.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.94%

-11.42%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.97%

-6.67%

-0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.51%

-12.00%

+9.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.05%

3.01%

+0.04%

Volatility

CGIE vs. EFA - Volatility Comparison

Capital Group International Equity ETF (CGIE) has a higher volatility of 7.97% compared to iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) at 7.51%. This indicates that CGIE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CGIEEFADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.97%

7.51%

+0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.18%

11.21%

+0.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.91%

17.74%

+0.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.19%

16.32%

-1.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.19%

17.20%

-2.01%