CGIE vs. EFA

In the year-to-date period, CGIE achieves a 18.43% return, which is significantly higher than EFA's 16.77% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

CGIE has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than EFA's 0.32% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group International Equity ETF (CGIE) and iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current CGIE Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is comparable to the EFA Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGIE and EFA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

CGIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than EFA's 2.77% yield.

The maximum CGIE drawdown since its inception was -13.81%, smaller than the maximum EFA drawdown of -61.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGIE and EFA.

The current volatility for Capital Group International Equity ETF (CGIE) is 2.91%, while iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) has a volatility of 3.26%. This indicates that CGIE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EFA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.