CGIAX vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about American Funds International Growth and Income Fund (CGIAX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
CGIAX is managed by American Funds. It was launched on Oct 1, 2008. VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010.
Performance
CGIAX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CGIAX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGIAX American Funds International Growth and Income Fund | -0.75% | 35.04% | 3.26% | 15.22% | -15.49% | 9.79% | 7.73% | 27.06% | -14.45% | 26.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | -4.42% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGIAX achieves a -0.75% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's -4.42% return. Over the past 10 years, CGIAX has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 8.48%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.05% annualized return.
CGIAX
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- -10.90%
- YTD
- -0.75%
- 6M
- 4.93%
- 1Y
- 24.81%
- 3Y*
- 14.05%
- 5Y*
- 7.15%
- 10Y*
- 8.48%
VOO
- 1D
- 2.86%
- 1M
- -5.01%
- YTD
- -4.42%
- 6M
- -1.84%
- 1Y
- 17.67%
- 3Y*
- 18.27%
- 5Y*
- 11.75%
- 10Y*
- 14.05%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CGIAX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGIAX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CGIAX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
CGIAX
VOO
CGIAX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds International Growth and Income Fund (CGIAX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CGIAX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.66 | 0.98 | +0.68 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.12 | 1.50 | +0.62 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.23 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.07 | 1.53 | +0.53 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.18 | 7.29 | +0.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CGIAX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.66 | 0.98 | +0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.70 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.78 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.83 | -0.40 |
Correlation
The correlation between CGIAX and VOO is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CGIAX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
CGIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.30%, more than VOO's 1.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGIAX American Funds International Growth and Income Fund | 8.30% | 8.13% | 3.34% | 2.27% | 3.99% | 6.90% | 1.35% | 2.36% | 2.74% | 1.80% | 2.29% | 3.17% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.19% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Drawdowns
CGIAX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGIAX drawdown since its inception was -35.78%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGIAX and VOO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGIAX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.78% | -33.99% | -1.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.90% | -11.98% | +1.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.60% | -24.52% | -6.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.78% | -33.99% | -1.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.90% | -6.29% | -4.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.99% | -3.72% | -4.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.75% | 2.52% | +0.23% |
Volatility
CGIAX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
American Funds International Growth and Income Fund (CGIAX) has a higher volatility of 5.77% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 5.29%. This indicates that CGIAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CGIAX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.77% | 5.29% | +0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.43% | 9.44% | -0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.41% | 18.10% | -3.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.40% | 16.82% | -2.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.81% | 17.99% | -2.18% |