CGHY vs. SCSB

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

CGHY (Capital Group High Yield Bond ETF) and SCSB (Sterling Capital Short Duration Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CGHY is a High Yield Bonds fund managed by Capital Group, while SCSB is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by Sterling Capital. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CGHY charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for SCSB.

Performance

CGHY vs. SCSB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group High Yield Bond ETF (CGHY) and Sterling Capital Short Duration Bond ETF (SCSB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CGHY

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 0.09%
• 6M: 1.82%
• YTD: 2.14%
• 1Y: 6.22%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SCSB

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 0.12%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGHY vs. SCSB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CGHY Capital Group High Yield Bond ETF	3.31%
SCSB Sterling Capital Short Duration Bond ETF	0.98%

Correlation

The correlation between CGHY and SCSB is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2026	0.55

Return for Risk

CGHY vs. SCSB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGHY

CGHY Risk / Return Rank: 75
CGHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
CGHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
CGHY Omega Ratio Rank: 78
CGHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
CGHY Martin Ratio Rank: 78

SCSB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGHY vs. SCSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group High Yield Bond ETF (CGHY) and Sterling Capital Short Duration Bond ETF (SCSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CGHY	SCSB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.86	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.94	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.58	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.76	—	—

Drawdowns

CGHY vs. SCSB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGHY drawdown since its inception was -2.38%, which is greater than SCSB's maximum drawdown of -0.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGHY and SCSB.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGHY	SCSB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.38%	-0.46%	-1.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.38%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.24%	-0.12%	-0.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.30%	-0.09%	-0.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.52%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CGHY	SCSB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.71%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.69%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.30%	1.46%	+1.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.28%	1.46%	+1.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.28%	1.46%	+1.82%

CGHY vs. SCSB - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGHY has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SCSB's 0.33% expense ratio.

Dividends

CGHY vs. SCSB - Dividend Comparison

CGHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.46%, more than SCSB's 1.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
CGHY Capital Group High Yield Bond ETF	5.46%	3.09%
SCSB Sterling Capital Short Duration Bond ETF	1.63%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGHY and SCSB in my portfolio?

CGHY and SCSB have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CGHY or SCSB?

On fees, SCSB is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CGHY or SCSB?

SCSB is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for CGHY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CGHY or SCSB?

CGHY has the higher dividend yield at 5.46%, compared with 1.63% for SCSB.

What is the main difference between CGHY and SCSB?

CGHY is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while SCSB is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and Sterling Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for CGHY and 0.33% for SCSB.