CGHY vs. BBHY
CGHY (Capital Group High Yield Bond ETF) and BBHY (JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CGHY charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for BBHY.
Performance
CGHY vs. BBHY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGHY achieves a 2.15% return, which is significantly higher than BBHY's 1.89% return.
CGHY
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 2.15%
- 6M
- 2.54%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BBHY
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- YTD
- 1.89%
- 6M
- 2.20%
- 1Y
- 6.68%
- 3Y*
- 8.90%
- 5Y*
- 4.05%
- 10Y*
- —
CGHY vs. BBHY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CGHY Capital Group High Yield Bond ETF | 2.15% | 3.83% |
BBHY JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.89% | 4.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGHY and BBHY is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.82 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGHY vs. BBHY — Risk / Return Rank
CGHY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BBHY
CGHY vs. BBHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group High Yield Bond ETF (CGHY) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CGHY | BBHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.36 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.83 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.61 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CGHY vs. BBHY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGHY drawdown since its inception was -2.38%, smaller than the maximum BBHY drawdown of -24.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGHY and BBHY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGHY | BBHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.38% | -24.98% | +22.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.37% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -0.14% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.31% | -2.36% | +2.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.53% | — |
Volatility
CGHY vs. BBHY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGHY | BBHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.04% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.94% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.33% | 3.68% | -0.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.33% | 7.28% | -3.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.33% | 7.52% | -4.19% |
CGHY vs. BBHY - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGHY has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than BBHY's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
CGHY vs. BBHY - Dividend Comparison
CGHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.07%, less than BBHY's 6.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBHY JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 6.92% | 7.24% | 7.18% | 6.49% | 5.92% | 4.06% | 4.73% | 4.99% | 5.02% | 4.81% | 1.42% |
CGHY Capital Group High Yield Bond ETF | 5.07% | 3.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGHY and BBHY have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BBHY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BBHY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for CGHY.
BBHY has the higher dividend yield at 6.92%, compared with 5.07% for CGHY.
They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for CGHY and 0.15% for BBHY.
Find the right allocation for CGHY and BBHY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer