CGGO vs. ANWPX

In the year-to-date period, CGGO achieves a 3.35% return, which is significantly lower than ANWPX's 5.86% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

CGGO has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than ANWPX's 0.72% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF (CGGO) and American Funds New Perspective Fund Class A (ANWPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current CGGO Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is lower than the ANWPX Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGGO and ANWPX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

CGGO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, more than ANWPX's 0.56% yield.

The maximum CGGO drawdown since its inception was -24.90%, smaller than the maximum ANWPX drawdown of -50.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGGO and ANWPX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF (CGGO) and American Funds New Perspective Fund Class A (ANWPX) have volatilities of 5.11% and 5.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.