CGHY vs. CGDV
CGHY (Capital Group High Yield Bond ETF) and CGDV (Capital Group Dividend Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CGHY is a High Yield Bonds fund managed by Capital Group, while CGDV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group. Over the past year, CGHY returned 6.22% vs 23.49% for CGDV. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CGHY charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for CGDV.
Performance
CGHY vs. CGDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGHY achieves a 2.14% return, which is significantly lower than CGDV's 14.07% return.
CGHY
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- 6M
- 1.82%
- YTD
- 2.14%
- 1Y
- 6.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CGDV
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 2.26%
- 6M
- 11.97%
- YTD
- 14.07%
- 1Y
- 23.49%
- 3Y*
- 23.97%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CGHY vs. CGDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CGHY Capital Group High Yield Bond ETF | 2.14% | 3.83% |
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF | 14.07% | 13.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGHY and CGDV is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.62 |
The correlation between CGHY and CGDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGHY vs. CGDV — Risk / Return Rank
CGHY
CGDV
CGHY vs. CGDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group High Yield Bond ETF (CGHY) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CGHY | CGDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.35 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.58 | 2.39 | +0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.76 | 11.10 | +0.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CGHY vs. CGDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGHY drawdown since its inception was -2.38%, smaller than the maximum CGDV drawdown of -21.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGHY and CGDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGHY | CGDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.38% | -21.82% | +19.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.38% | -9.75% | +7.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.28% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.24% | 0.00% | -0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.30% | -3.55% | +3.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.52% | 2.10% | -1.58% |
Volatility
CGHY vs. CGDV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Capital Group High Yield Bond ETF (CGHY) is 0.71%, while Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) has a volatility of 4.36%. This indicates that CGHY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGHY | CGDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.71% | 4.36% | -3.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.69% | 10.03% | -7.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.30% | 12.32% | -9.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.28% | 15.52% | -12.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.28% | 15.52% | -12.24% |
CGHY vs. CGDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGHY has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than CGDV's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
CGHY vs. CGDV - Dividend Comparison
CGHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.46%, more than CGDV's 1.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF | 1.18% | 1.29% | 1.60% | 1.65% | 1.36% |
CGHY Capital Group High Yield Bond ETF | 5.46% | 3.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGHY and CGDV have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CGDV has higher volatility (4.36%) compared to CGHY (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGHY dropped -2.38% vs CGDV's -21.82%.
On 1-year performance, CGDV leads with 23.49% vs 6.22% for CGHY. On fees, CGDV is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, CGHY has been the lower-risk option at 0.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CGDV has performed better with a 23.49% return vs 6.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CGDV is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for CGHY.
CGHY has the higher dividend yield at 5.46%, compared with 1.18% for CGDV.
CGHY is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while CGDV is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for CGHY and 0.33% for CGDV.
CGDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CGHY and CGDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer